You spittled out, "Right now, every woman has the RIGHT TO CHOOSE whether or not she'll have a child, and there is no problem other than that of those who are obsessed with wanting to take away that right and return her to the last century." Do you really want we freepers to believe you see no difference in 'right to have a child' and right to kill an alive unborn child conceieved by no fault or irresponsibilty on the child's part? Is your goddesshood actually dependant upon the 'rite' to hire the slaughter of an unborn girl or boy to avoid child birth of an alive human being? Do you really believe the unborn are not human beings? My my, you sure have fallen upon the wrong website for your goddesshood.
Your post is a good example of the 'talking down' that the conference I read about [here, BTW] is focusing on correcting.
The "I'm right, you're wrong" approach is not the way to achieve the abolition of Roe v Wade. Striving for common ground is tantamoung to success.
Next time you want to be cavalier about pro-choice, try talking to someone whose relative was KILLED in one of those clinic bombings. Can you truly defend THAT murder based on the concept that the clinic employee had a choice?
I just thought of something: abortion is like drug addiction. Take away the supply and I just bet you'll see a decrease in demand. Except for the black market, of course.