Don't know that this needs the "ping-machine;" it updates and corrects a previous thread, as noted in my post #1, above. But I gather Junior is the resident FR evo archivist, and maybe he would like to take note.
I wonder if the creator of we humans sometimes doesn't shake His head, thinking: "I guess the 'intelligent' quotient didn't survive the design process."
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her policy is on the teaching of creationism as a subject in schools; and if she will make a statement.
Minister's answer [Jacqui Smith]:
Neither creationism nor intelligent design is taught as a subject in schools. The national curriculum programme of study for science at key stage 4 covers evolution. It sets out that pupils should be taught "that the fossil record is evidence for evolution" and also "how variation and selection may lead to evolution or extinction". Pupils should however be taught about "how scientific controversies can arise from different ways of interpreting empirical evidence". Also, the biblical view of creation can be taught in RE [Religious Education] lessons, where pupils are taught to consider opposing theories and come to their own, reasoned conclusions. Therefore, although creationism and intelligent design are not part of the national curriculum, they could be covered in these contexts.
Ping for later read.