Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"
Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 601-614 next last
To: SelectiveJNJ

It's possible the nukes are here waiting for the fresh trigger devices to smuggled across the Mexico border.


101 posted on 04/28/2006 9:46:13 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

You are so wrong. Artillery shells have been made, VERY small, that are 10kt and are simply Uranium 235 gun-type assemblies.

No fancy 'worn out parts', nothing. They didn't test Little Boy design for that reason, and most likely neither did South Africa when they had them. This is the real threat, a 10-20kt non-boosted U-235 gun assembly that can be made as small as an artillery shell.


102 posted on 04/28/2006 9:46:37 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Well thanks big guy...but did YOU hear the debate. He mentioned why he wrote the book and explained in very believable terms his motivations. And he sounded quite truthful about his motivations...but you do know better and alas I am gullible...YIKES!


103 posted on 04/28/2006 9:46:37 AM PDT by repubzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

A better question,

Why are you posting flamebait on a website you help run?

Why will long time freepers continue to frequent the site if the discussion devolves into what your post inevitably leads to?


104 posted on 04/28/2006 9:47:24 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

You said -- "Nutjob "clerics" who will give their blessing to any harebrained scheme are a dime a dozen in Jihadistan."

They may appear to be "nutjobs" to our way of looking at things -- but -- they do have a "rationale" (although that rationale is evil, from the way we see the world). There are "absolutes" and they are evil as a result of the "absolutes" we have -- which stem from the Bible and the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

So, they are evil -- but -- they are *not* without a "rationale" for what they do and without "reasoning" for what they do.

Regards,
Star Traveler


105 posted on 04/28/2006 9:47:32 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"

Using nukes on the general population of the USA will result in the complete eradication of islam.

106 posted on 04/28/2006 9:47:41 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Every man must be tempted, sometimes,to hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

250lbs is bigger than a suitcase, but the design is still feasible and simple. And it's small enough to move around, even if it was 500lbs. Hell, I have a gun safe that's nearly 1000lbs and it's been moved by 2 guys and a dolly!


107 posted on 04/28/2006 9:47:48 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Are we going to allow the Iranians to get hold of a nuke to militarily blackmail us, the same way the Iranians are economically blackmailing the West with their pitiful oil?


108 posted on 04/28/2006 9:48:36 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Just to clear the air in the Arabic countries, any move to detonate a nuclear device the the U.S. will result in complete annihilation of all Arabic countries.


109 posted on 04/28/2006 9:49:57 AM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Uh....I'm the one who frequently gets flamed for fighting against the Nuke 'Em All crowd. OK, my language was a little stronger than normal, to get on par with this idiot's threat that al Qaeda will nuke us if we bomb Iran. I would like to take out the schizophrenic government in Tehran. WITHOUT nukes. And know most of the people of Iran would help us do it.


110 posted on 04/28/2006 9:50:09 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

You said -- "And we've never "nuked entire countries", so I'm not sure where that question is commin' from."

Well, it's probaby coming from "knee-jerk, armchair, military general wannabees".

All I can say is that it's a good thing that they never "made general".

Regards,
Star Traveler


111 posted on 04/28/2006 9:51:08 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: elchrio
Having done a lot of research on nuclear weapons in the past 5 years, I just don't see all of this, that is being hyped, as a serious threat of.

If a nuke is going to be used against the United States, I expect it to be smuggled onto a freighter and detonated in once in port long before it is ever unloaded.

112 posted on 04/28/2006 9:51:43 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Well, I've advocated all along a "war on Islam" -- in order to totally eliminate it from the world and make it illegal everywhere you find it.

I maintain that the Bush/Powell/Rice foreign policy doctrine post 911 has been to try to find a way to defeat the Jihadists without declaring war on Islam.

I believe that they have failed. 

I believe that they have failed because John Kerry and Dan Rather and Chirac and Putin and the UN and a million others who hate America and western civilization as we understand it (meaning "not socialism") would rather ally with Bin Laden than with George Bush, under any circumstances.

And there are consequences to that sort of failure.  And the logical outcome is all out war.  They are already waging it against us.  As this thread makes clear there are those among us who are not willing to do so against them, declaration or not.

In the age of nukes, once nukes are used, all out war is all out war.  No quarter.  No civilians cordoned off from harm.  No prisoners or Supreme Court hearings over rights of combatants.  They've got no rights if they're dead.  If we don't kill them then we're dead.  Simple, binary equation.

113 posted on 04/28/2006 9:52:05 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Between you and me, I hope, and I have trust, that the US military will actually do what it takes to eliminate the threat after a 1-20 or worse nuke attack on our cities. I assume Russia may be off limits, but probably not China.

The islamic world will be hopefully be a memory.


114 posted on 04/28/2006 9:52:27 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

I started to write a response but then thought better of it. There is no amount of logic that could possibly correct all the idiotic opinions expressed in your last post.


115 posted on 04/28/2006 9:52:39 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Bob, he was right. If they nuked us, all bets are off.

They damn well better be.


116 posted on 04/28/2006 9:53:45 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

They will use nukes anyway.


117 posted on 04/28/2006 9:54:02 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Well, okey dokey, then. If you read my posts on this thread, you'll see that I've never advocated nuking anyone. I merely countered someone else's assertion that New York was a "terrorist-friendly" city.

Enjoy your day.
118 posted on 04/28/2006 9:54:02 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Jaysin

You said -- "hey--I live near NY--keep me out of it."

Well.., to the "nuke-em crowd" -- you're fair game. Sorry to tell you this...

Regards,
Star Traveler


119 posted on 04/28/2006 9:54:08 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That is a great point. There were reports out last year-on this site that claimed that Osama was looking for and NEEDING a go ahead from a cleric. HE did find some but it was a hard sell. Many thought the attack and counter attack would kill too many of the faithful.

God people-we are doing the worst thing and underestimating our enemy! This is not a chicken little statement either!!

They follow their rules very strictly. Go off the reservation too much and a fatwa would be issued. Please look these things up before shooting them down. Its in the Koran..

Know thine enemy...


120 posted on 04/28/2006 9:54:23 AM PDT by repubzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson