Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"
Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 601-614 next last
To: Altair333
"If they ever do use them, it will most likely be against Israel- they have no missiles capable of reaching the US."

That situation could change by way of China selling them the technology Clinton sold them.

Or, if the Clintons return to the White House in 2208 they could just go directly to the source.

241 posted on 04/28/2006 10:55:08 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American (Christianity and religion are two entirely different things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

The US nor any President is not going to indiscriminately bomb cities because we are angry. Any kind of nuke strike, if there is one at all, will be preceded by substantial documentation of complicity.


242 posted on 04/28/2006 10:55:34 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: michigander

"Perhaps they're just waiting for the right sort of 'target rich' envrironment. Something like, say, hundreds of thousands of people out in the streets of a large number of major cities all at the same time?"

As in the upcoming May Day illegal protests???


243 posted on 04/28/2006 10:55:45 AM PDT by rfp1234 (I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

Your insiders are incorrect. You would amplify the problem by nuking mecca.


244 posted on 04/28/2006 10:56:11 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

"The US nor any President is not going to indiscriminately bomb cities because we are angry"

Hiroshima and Nagasaki and even Dresden might disagree with you.

When things are serious, your happy horse-s isn't gonna go far.


245 posted on 04/28/2006 10:56:38 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
There's a big concentration of Islamic terrorists in that city

That's a misconception. Half the Arabs in Detroit are Christians (the Chaldeans) - most of the rest were refugees from Saddam's Iraq and most of them have no love for the jihadists.

That said there ARE plenty of jihadists here - just as there are in most major American cities.

I would be willing to bet there are more jihadists in the D.C. area than in Detroit. Just because C.A.I.R. is headquartered here doesn't mean the area is seething with jihadists.

246 posted on 04/28/2006 10:57:15 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

How would it amplify please?


247 posted on 04/28/2006 10:57:15 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

"I can just say, that I know some insiders and I know that it's already inflamed. You can not inflame it more or less by nuking mecca."

Baloney.


248 posted on 04/28/2006 10:57:37 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: technomage
"Now there is a country in the world threatening over and over and over to use NUCLEAR WEAPONS on their enemies, and the anti-war, pacifist, anti-nuclear lefties are mute."

The obvious explanation is that the leftists are not really anti anything except a free and powerful United States.

249 posted on 04/28/2006 10:58:10 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American (Christianity and religion are two entirely different things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

So what's keeping them from using them now?


250 posted on 04/28/2006 10:58:27 AM PDT by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

Because you would turn the percentage of muslims that are on our side, (you see some of them actually hate these radical muslims) and one that just dont want to be involved against us too.

Thus amplifying the problem.


251 posted on 04/28/2006 10:58:58 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Things are already at maximum inflamation.

It's alreading bubbling over, it can not get any worse. If anything, it'll calm down right afterwards. Many will see allah's a sham and doesn't protect mecca.

You don't realize how much importance they place on the invulnerability of mecca.


252 posted on 04/28/2006 10:59:30 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

You said -- "Go ahead bud - 45 minutes later the Middle East will be a smoking crater."

It will never happen. Are they going to bomb Iraq with all our troops in there? Are they going to bomb Israel? Are they going to bomb Lebanon, when we're trying to get Syria out of there and get Lebanon established on their own again? Are they going to bomb Egypt, too?

You're simply "yapping" like a little dog with a bunch of big dogs around. They sure do make a lot of noise, but nothing happens.

Nothing will happen in the way of the U.S. nuking other countries.

Regards,
Star Traveler


253 posted on 04/28/2006 10:59:57 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

No, a large percentage will realize that mecca/allah are not invulnerable. That'll be a huge hit to their morale..

A massive net gain.


254 posted on 04/28/2006 11:00:20 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

It's not wishful thinking - it's because of the kind of people they are.

Did you hear them bluster and threaten before 9/11?

When they're quietest is when they're the most dangerous.

It's also "war on the cheap" - all they have to do is threaten and they have everyone running around in hysterics.


255 posted on 04/28/2006 11:00:27 AM PDT by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Well, as long as Russia has said it has accounted for and has had control over all it's nuclear issues and their underpaid scientists for the last 20 years, I'm good with that.

How about everyone else?


256 posted on 04/28/2006 11:01:33 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

BTW - What about China, North Korea and Pakistan?


257 posted on 04/28/2006 11:02:01 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

"Well, as long as Russia has said it has accounted for and has had control over all it's nuclear issues and their underpaid scientists for the last 20 years, I'm good with that"

And NK promised Billy that they'd not make nukes too.

C'mon, who cares what Russia says or doesn't. They're a useless source.


258 posted on 04/28/2006 11:02:53 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

You said -- "I dont see how Right Whale or I are posturing that we not fight them. What we are pointing out is that if you destroy their religious sites you will make the problem worse."

This takes away their "foundation" for their religion. That's their thinking on the matter. That's how they perceive it. It may not be the way you perceive it, but it's their way. So eliminating all their holy sites -- totally and completely -- dismantling all the mosques in the U.S. and worldwide, jailing and (if necessary) killing all their clerics -- this will knock the ground out from underneath them.

Regards,
Star Traveler


259 posted on 04/28/2006 11:02:55 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

You think that will be the result in a "martyr" based society? I dont.


260 posted on 04/28/2006 11:03:04 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson