Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I would rather they suck their brains out.

These same people think it is good enough for a baby in the womb. How could they argue it isn't good enough for a convicted murderer?


4 posted on 04/29/2006 12:39:55 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DB

After I freaked out for about 3 minutes, I realized you should introduce that into the national debate.


The sensitive treatment we use to end the life of a full term baby, should be at least discussed, as a gentle solution to the removal of murderers.


6 posted on 04/29/2006 12:52:17 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DB
"These same people think it is good enough for a baby in the womb. How could they argue it isn't good enough for a convicted murderer?"

That's partial birth abortion. Let's do it the way they do if for regular abortions. Rip the limbs off with forceps, and rip the body apart as it's being pulled out of the womb, then casually toss the body into a pail. Yeh, that sounds humane enough. It's good enough for babies....it's good enough for murderers. I rather like what the Hebrew law of the Old Testament says: The avenger of blood (a person related to the murdered victim, or close friend if no relative is left) will take the life of the murderer, any way they see fit. How 'bout doing to the murderer what the murderer did to the victim in the same manner, at the same pace.

21 posted on 04/29/2006 6:08:07 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson