Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Hard Chargers Try to Return Party to Power
The New York Times ^ | April 30, 2006 | Stephen Crowley

Posted on 04/30/2006 12:54:09 PM PDT by Torie

Senator Charles E. Schumer, and Representative Rahm Emanuel are leading the campaign committees to get Democrats elected to Congress.

They are fast-talking, hard-charging, wisecracking graduates of two of the most punishing political training grounds in the nation. Representative Rahm Emanuel of Chicago and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York are loud, garrulous urban brawlers: a blur of endlessly quotable attack lines, opportunistic legislative proposals, relentless fund-raising and big-shoulder tactics.

Mr. Emanuel is the head of the Democratic campaign committee in the House, and Mr. Schumer has the same job in the Senate. ...

"They have the party by the neck and they are shaking it," said James Carville, who met Mr. Emanuel in the 1992 presidential campaign for Bill Clinton. Even Richard Bond, a former [RNC] chairman, described them as "both brilliant at what they are doing: they are performing the way party leadership ought to perform."

To their critics they are shameless self-promoters who will do anything — Mr. Emanuel recited a mock "How do I love thee" sonnet from Republicans to lobbyists on the House floor on Thursday — in search of a headline.

... [They are a] startling contrast [to] Senator Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina, whose tepid fund-raising and low profile have stirred discontent in her party, and Representative Thomas M. Reynolds of New York, who is facing a tough challenge to his own seat — orchestrated, of course, by the no-holds-barred gentleman from Chicago.

...

In one sign of how these men have sent waves of worry through Republican circles, Mr. Schumer's committee reported in March that it had $32.1 million in the bank, compared with just $16.5 million in the Republican Senate account. Mr. Emanuel's committee had $23 million, almost the same as the $24.4 million by the Republican Congressional committee.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; congress

1 posted on 04/30/2006 12:54:13 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crasher; AntiGuv

Ping.


2 posted on 04/30/2006 12:54:54 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

If the Democratic Party would dump Schumer, and Kennedy, and Hillary, and Durbin, and the other idiots who are front and center any time a camera is present, they would fare really well.


3 posted on 04/30/2006 12:55:46 PM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie; Doctor Raoul
"They have the party by the neck and they are shaking it," said James Carville, who met Mr. Emanuel in the 1992 presidential campaign for Bill Clinton....

That's not the only thing they're trying to shake. In fact, I think Serpenthead is trying to pull my middle leg.

4 posted on 04/30/2006 12:56:49 PM PDT by sauropod (Gael Murphy calls Kristinn her very own "teddy bear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Cheerleading from the Times. Rah, rah, rah. Start the Soviet national anthem.


5 posted on 04/30/2006 12:56:49 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Rahm is my congressman here in Chicago. He bigfooted a perfectly good socialist to get his stepping stone to power.

He's a pig.

6 posted on 04/30/2006 1:03:39 PM PDT by Thebaddog (My dogs are on their backs with their feet in the air)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Shmucky Chucky is an obnoxious goofball.


7 posted on 04/30/2006 1:19:53 PM PDT by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

"... are loud, garrulous urban brawlers ..."

... are loud-mouthed, obnoxious, lowlife, hate-America, socialist-commie-fascist scum...

There; that's more accurate.


8 posted on 04/30/2006 1:20:58 PM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

"Rahm is my congressman here in Chicago. He bigfooted a perfectly good socialist to get his stepping stone to power. He's a pig."

And I'd wish somebody in Chicago would take a good, long, and hard look at where he picked up his personal wealth.


9 posted on 04/30/2006 1:24:55 PM PDT by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque
"accurate"

For the last thirty years, as evidenced by the Progressive Caucus of which all but one are Democrats (and that one is avowed socialist Bernie Sanders from Vermont, The Donkey Party has been making a mad dash for the extreme left side of the political spectrum.

10 posted on 04/30/2006 1:26:41 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Chuck Scummier is a candy ass not a brawler.He's about as tough as the queers on Queer Eye For The Straight Guy.
11 posted on 04/30/2006 1:27:37 PM PDT by rdcorso (There Is No Such Thing As A Neutral Person During A War With Radical Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
They are fast-talking, hard-charging, wisecracking graduates of two of the most punishing political training grounds in the nation. Representative Rahm Emanuel of Chicago and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York are loud, garrulous urban brawlers: a blur of endlessly quotable attack lines, opportunistic legislative proposals, relentless fund-raising and big-shoulder tactics.

Comment:

The author forgot to put in that both are @ssholes and have the morals of most every muck diving Democrat sewer rat leader.

I just can't see myself sitting down to have a coke with either of these two turds that have floated to the top of their sewer.
12 posted on 04/30/2006 1:32:00 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
Let's compare notes. I know he has some roots to Cleveland. He served in the Israeli Army and was a ballet dancer. He worked at Goldman Sachs after the Clinton years. And his brother, Ari, is the Hollywood agent that is the basis for the Jeremy Piven character in the show, Entourage.

What do you know about his money? Did he get it the old fashioned way by marrying it?

13 posted on 04/30/2006 1:32:48 PM PDT by Thebaddog (My dogs are on their backs with their feet in the air)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

"What do you know about his money? Did he get it the old fashioned way by marrying it?"

1. Mossad spy
2. Specialized in fundraising initially in Illinois campaigns and then nationally.
3. Director of Finance in the 1992 Presidential campaign of then-Governor Bill Clinton.
4. "This is about winning campaigns. I come from the Vince Lombardi school: 'Winning is everything.'"
5. Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), the boss of the House Democratic political operation who is making ethics a centerpiece issue in the November elections, last month quietly switched campaign treasurers -- from a federal lobbyist who has for a long time served in that role to someone else.

Emanuel's move comes as GOP leaders who control Congress are seriously considering a crackdown on ethics rules in the wake of an unfolding GOP scandal triggered by the conviction of Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Kathleen Connery, Emanuel's government spokesman, said the treasurer, William Singer, a lawyer and a lobbyist, has been replaced. Asked why, Connery replied, "It's obvious.''

The obvious, I surmise, is this: Emanuel saw the need to get his own ethics house in order. Singer is a former Chicago alderman whose friendship with Emanuel predates his election to Congress. Singer is also a fund-raiser for Senate Democrats.

With the ethics issue heating up, Singer told me he stepped down because "I respect him and want to help him and the best way to do that is not to serve in a meaningless job as treasurer.'' Singer said he will continue to raise money for Emanuel, one of the most prolific fund-raisers in Washington.

6. And more from the Chicago Sun-Times (of all papers!): Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), the boss of the House Democratic political operation who is making ethics a centerpiece issue in the November elections, last month quietly switched campaign treasurers -- from a federal lobbyist who has for a long time served in that role to someone else.



Emanuel's move comes as GOP leaders who control Congress are seriously considering a crackdown on ethics rules in the wake of an unfolding GOP scandal triggered by the conviction of Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Kathleen Connery, Emanuel's government spokesman, said the treasurer, William Singer, a lawyer and a lobbyist, has been replaced. Asked why, Connery replied, "It's obvious.''

The obvious, I surmise, is this: Emanuel saw the need to get his own ethics house in order. Singer is a former Chicago alderman whose friendship with Emanuel predates his election to Congress. Singer is also a fund-raiser for Senate Democrats.

With the ethics issue heating up, Singer told me he stepped down because "I respect him and want to help him and the best way to do that is not to serve in a meaningless job as treasurer.'' Singer said he will continue to raise money for Emanuel, one of the most prolific fund-raisers in Washington.

I wrote about Singer's connection to Emanuel's campaign Jan. 3, 2002, when Emanuel was first running for his seat.

In Washington, Singer represents United Airlines, mainly on pension issues and Verizon on telecommunication legislation.

Emanuel sits on the Ways and Means Committee, which handles many pension matters. Singer lobbied him on one issue and Emanuel voted against Singer's position.

Emanuel took on ethics as a cause last May when then Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was under a darkening ethics cloud. Eventually DeLay was indicted on Texas campaign money-laundering charges. DeLay stepped down permanently as majority leader once Abramoff filed his guilty plea since people close to DeLay may be implicated in the widening Abramoff probe.

Back in May, Emanuel and Rep. Marty Meehan (D-Mass.) introduced a legislative package of much-needed ethics reforms. Before Abramoff's plea, however, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) showed no interest in moving on the ethics front. The speaker also had no intention of helping Emanuel, who at that point was, with other Democrats, just starting to develop their theme of the GOP congressional "Culture of Corruption.''

The Emanuel-Meehan news conference came two days after the U.S. attorney in Chicago announced a plea agreement with Gerald Wesolowski, a top lieutenant in City Hall's Water Department, part of the ongoing Hired Truck corruption scandal. The pleadings said that City Hall's political army was used to do field work on behalf of campaigns affiliated with Mayor Daley, Emanuel and several others. Emanuel said he knew nothing about City Hall pressuring workers to campaign for him.

But if Emanuel was worried about an ethics spotlight shining on him, it did not show. In October, the Center for Public Integrity, a nonpartisan investigative organization, found that federally registered lobbyists serve as campaign treasurers for 68 federal campaign funds and 61 political action committees run by members of Congress. One of those committees highlighted was Emanuel's.

This week kicks off almost frantic attempts by Republicans and Democrats to move ahead on ethics legislation. As I write this, none of the pending ethics bills calls for a ban on lobbyists having an official role on a fund-raising committee.

But it's coming.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), newly appointed Democratic spokesman on ethics, spent much of Wednesday on ethics matters.

I asked Obama about his views on lobbyists serving as campaign treasurers. "It is the sort of practice that raises great suspicion,'' said Obama. ". . . I personally think that a bright line rule saying lobbyists cannot hold those positions is appropriate. That is something that I would support.''

7. Even thought former Democrat congressman Frank Ballance was sentenced to four years in prison for conspiring to divert taxpayer money to his law firm and family, the DCCC (headed by Rahm Emanuel) has been unwilling to return $29,500 in donations Ballance made to their coffers...

8. Mayor Daley and the Daley family political base’s 11th Ward Democratic organization were recipients of “coerced” campaign contributions, according to the plea agreement of former city Water Department Director of Finance and Administration Gerald Wesolowski. [...]
Congressman Emanuel, elected in 2002, was the recipient of Water Department employee campaign “volunteers,” presumably in his successful primary campaign against State Rep. Nancy Kaszak (D-Chicago).
...
According to the plea agreement, Water Department employees and other city employees were recruited for political work in violation of the Shakman Decree (1969) which forbids the hiring and firing of non-policy making city employees for political reasons. According to the plea agreement, Donald Tomczak, the former First Deputy Commissioner of Mayor Richard Daley’s Water Department, "rewarded certain members of his political organization...with raises, promotions and overtime, in return for their participation in Tomczak directed political activities."

Wesolowski, 46, who was indicted on 15 counts ranging including racketeering, bribery, mail fraud, and obstruction of justice agreed to plead guilty one count of mail fraud and to cooperate in the government’s case.

Wesolowski was one of the bagmen for Tomczak, a co-defendant in the indictment. He is the 6th person to plead guilty in Hired Truck probe to date, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.


According to Wesolowski's plea agreement, "candidates receiving support via this criminal enterprise were 'Jeff Tomczak, mayoral candidate Richard Daley, judicial candidate Amy Bertani, United States congressional candidate Rahm Emanuel and others.' There is also a reference to an unnamed 'Candidate A' with reference to fund raising."

9. Blind Trusts http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2004/N00024813_2004.pdf

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2003/N00024813_2003.pdf

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2002/N00024813_2002.pdf

10. http://search.hp.netscape.com/hp/boomframe.jsp?query=Rahm+Emanuel&page=5&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3Deaa4c0375e4f7c49%26clickedItemRank%3D65%26userQuery%3DRahm%2BEmanuel%26clickedItemURN%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fherndon1.sdrdc.com%252Fcgi-bin%252Fcom_detail%252FC00368829%26invocationType%3Dnext%26fromPage%3DHPNextPrevB%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fherndon1.sdrdc.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fcom_detail%2FC00368829


14 posted on 04/30/2006 2:19:26 PM PDT by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Torie

The DNC: A cult in search of a clue!


15 posted on 04/30/2006 2:56:14 PM PDT by Trunk 71-74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
When Tom DeLay did this sort of thing the Slimes attacked him.

The NY Times is thoroughly disgusting in their naked, rank liberalism.

16 posted on 04/30/2006 2:58:12 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

A winning strategy is to take votes away from the other side as in running conservative black Republicans to woo blacks to vote with white Republicans. Rahm Emmanuel is running Iraq war discontents to piss off Republicans, but that won't get him the votes he needs.


17 posted on 04/30/2006 3:54:14 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Torie
GOP fund raising for last quarter was double the Democrats.
18 posted on 04/30/2006 3:55:29 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
"A winning strategy is to take votes away from the other side as in..."

1) attempting to divide the base with divisive issues, and

2) promoting third party candidates who siphon off votes.

19 posted on 04/30/2006 3:57:46 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-40

I doubt it. The Democrats live and die by being demagogues.


20 posted on 04/30/2006 6:05:33 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson