Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: popdonnelly

In some ways that is not such a bad thing. As a former archaeologist, it pains me to see sites excavated in the early 1900s and know that they destroyed a whole lot of information that *today* we could have retrieved. In 100 or 200 years, who knows what they could retrieve?

So long as the parking lot doesn't negatively impact the site, I don't really see the problem.


57 posted on 04/30/2006 11:07:59 PM PDT by Betis70 (moto weather is back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Betis70
Im not sure what 'concreted over' means. I take it they did not pour concrete over the actual ruins?

In any case, i was in Italy several times, and well.. There are soooo many excavated ruins that 'museums' are stacking blocks, pillars and statues next and on top of each other outside the buildings.

They dig artefacts up, yet fail to store them correctly so now they dissolve in the nowadays acid rain. And those are the lucky ruins, cause there are many that are simply abandoned completely.

So agree with you. If you can't take care of what you are digging up, better just let it rest.
62 posted on 05/01/2006 6:01:29 AM PDT by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson