Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN is like the Twilight Zone, says Bolton
The Daily Telegraph ^ | May 1, 2006 | Alec Russell

Posted on 05/01/2006 12:13:48 AM PDT by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: MadIvan
America's bantam cock of an ambassador is something of a cult figure at the UN.


21 posted on 05/01/2006 3:58:56 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

UN officials mutter that far from helping to push through much-needed reforms to ensure embarrassments such as the oil-for-food scandal are never repeated, his methods have impeded the chances of agreement.

Oil for food scandal, Coffee Anus' son, UN peacekeepers committing sex crimes, countries like Libya, Cuba, Syria, Iran, etc. heading up committies dealing with disarmament, and human rights, and resolutions that are laughed at and have no meaning.....but it is Bolton that is the problem in their eyes?

Seriously, any candidate in 2008 that runs on a platform of making sure that this criminal organization is removed from our soil has got my vote, without question.

22 posted on 05/01/2006 4:47:48 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The U.S. Pres. and most of Wash. politicians thinks the U.N. is important and worth saving. My question is, 'just why is the U.N. important'? Just the facts. Is there ANY important use that the U.N. is used for? Has the U.N. at any time since it's conception been of any use to any country? Has it every stopped a war? Can it stop anything? Has it helped with any type of trade agreements that were not crooked?
Is the U.N. there just for the use of the high class politicians from all over the world?
I think I would really like to know just what GOOD is the U.N. to anyone in the world. What good have they done that is not done by a country or several countries anyway and still do if there were not a U.N.?


23 posted on 05/01/2006 4:49:35 AM PDT by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brit_Guy
"Genuine question - (I'm not fishing for a particular response): When was this time you miss? You imply it is within living memory - so I am curious for an American perspective on when the real golden age was?"

When Senators could call out another Senator, and take a pair of Dueling pistols and end a unbreachable impasse, the U.S. Senate functioned more efficiently and with far less PC bullsh!t! Perhaps that was our "Golden Age"!

Short of that, Term Limits would help today!

LLS
24 posted on 05/01/2006 5:03:44 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The UN is simply the most public symbol of the international communist movement on American soil. Its influence is felt across America via our federal bureaucracy that is illegally implementing unratified UN treaties such as the biodiversity treaty, voted down by the US senate in 1994. The UN should have been ripped down the same day the Berlin Wall fell.


25 posted on 05/01/2006 5:20:08 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Communism is 3 people voting on what's for dinner but you still get the same old commissar rice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Thanks Ivan, but with replies like that you're going to lose the tag "Mad". I agree with your comments. You're right on target from my perspective.


26 posted on 05/01/2006 9:53:35 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

Not only its history is a failure but its dithering over facing real evil is so self-evident, only leftist delusionals think it has a part in governing the world. The USA should start its own Western-Eastern alliance which unites those who are democratic, capitalistic, for those nations open to these two levels, and reform a united NATO which would include those nations willing to fight Islamofacism and totalitarianism on all levels. Let the UN fall on its own corrupt sword. There is no reformation for it and Bolton is right in his condemnation. Now if only W would join in, we might see a very radical change in a opt-in with committment world organization.


27 posted on 05/01/2006 10:22:00 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Bolton bump!


I wish they would bulldoze the place,
and pave a (more useful) parking lot.


28 posted on 05/01/2006 4:19:47 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; nopardons

Another Bush globalist pulling wool over the eyes of the true believers. [chuckle]


29 posted on 05/01/2006 4:24:14 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mr Bolton rolls his eyes when asked if he is combative because he is not really interested in reform. "That criticism is a complete non sequitur," he retorts. "My stance is not combative. I would describe it as assertive.

LOL!!! Overestimating just a bit, isn't he? Silly guy.

30 posted on 05/01/2006 7:03:05 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brit_Guy

"I am curious for an American perspective on when the real golden age was?"

August, 1945; two cities somewhere in Japan!


31 posted on 05/04/2006 12:05:27 AM PDT by Herakles (Liberals are stone stupid and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. ...it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
32 posted on 05/04/2006 12:23:22 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson