Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic militants blamed as 35 Hindus are killed
The Scotsman ^ | May 2, 2006 | PRAKRIITI GUPTA

Posted on 05/02/2006 12:48:34 AM PDT by MadIvan

SUSPECTED Islamic militants have killed at least 35 Hindus in separate incidents in Indian Kashmir.

Twenty-two people were gunned down when a village was raided, and the bodies of 13 shepherds abducted over the weekend have been found.

In the village raid, more than a dozen militants dressed in army fatigues stormed Panjdobi and Thava hamlets in Doda province, and asked the Hindu families to gather at the house of the local head- man. The villagers were then lined up and shot indiscriminately, a police spokesman said.

Rakesh Sharma, an eyewitness whose brother was among the injured, said they were sleeping when armed gunmen dressed in army uniforms knocked and asked them to gather at the headman's house. "We were tied with ropes, beaten and then lined up and shot at. I escaped while many were dead. There was blood and cries all around," he said.

"Since there was no security forces in proximity, the injured were shifted to hospital only at 8am in the morning."

For centuries, Kashmir's Hindus - known as Pandits - lived peacefully alongside the area's Muslim majority.

But the Pandits have been targeted relentlessly by Islamic insurgents who have been fighting since 1989 to wrest Kashmir from largely Hindu India. An estimated 2,000 have been killed.

The latest killings come days before Kashmir's political separatists are due to meet Manmohan Singh, the Indian prime minister, who suggested the murders would not hamper efforts to find peace in the region, divided between India and Pakistan.

"People of Kashmir have rejected and rebuffed terrorists repeatedly," he said.

India has repeatedly accused Pakistan of backing the militants, even as the two rival nations have talked peace. Mr Singh, however, stopped short of blaming Islamabad for the new attacks.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: india; islamists; kashmir; militants; pakistan
Sympathies to the people of India.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 05/02/2006 12:48:38 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; agrace; EggsAckley; dinasour; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/02/2006 12:49:08 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
the article states that the mudslimes are the majority in the Doda province. It then calls the terrorists 'insurgents'
3 posted on 05/02/2006 12:53:20 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Genghis Khan

..."blamed?" IIRC, an Islamist terrorist group took credit for the massacre.


4 posted on 05/02/2006 12:55:06 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The religion of peace strikes again.


5 posted on 05/02/2006 12:56:35 AM PDT by TypeZoNegative (".... We are a nation of Americans. We are DECENDED from legal immigrants"- johnandrhonda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Its Lashkar-e-Toiba behind this attack.

The problem is the two major Muslim political parties in Jammu and Kashmir, the PDP (currently in power along with the Congress party) and the National Conference (in the opposition), both overwhelmingly Muslim, don't give shit about Hindus.

Deep inside they both want the Hindus out of the valley. The Muslim politicians along with the secessionist ones from the Hurryat Conference have amassed large amount of wealth (by evading taxes and through funding from Pakistan and Europe) while launching their political careers (and attracting international media limelight) by harping on their favourite tune of "New Delhi being responsible for alienating the Kashmiris". The fact remains that the bulk of India's national resource is sucked by Kashmir when there are far more poorer states in India waiting in line for more. Few people know the fact that the Indian Jammu and Kashmir is actually a rich state, far richer than the Pak occupied portion.

The Muslims politicians are only interested in trivial issues like opening of the border regions with Pakistan, surrendering and rehabilitation of "misguided youths", and starting of bus services between Muzzafarbad (Pak) and Baramulla (India) so that they don't feel "alienated". The 400 000 dying Hindu refugees can wait. It suits the Muslims, the can always grab the real estate and property left behind by the 400 000 Hindu refugees in Kashmir. Kashmiri Muslims politicians will only comfort them with lip service and politicians in New Delhi will try to make India appear as a "tolerant secular nation" to the international community by conceding to the Muslim demands. The Hindus can go to hell for all they care.
6 posted on 05/02/2006 2:22:07 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Even the Buddhist from Ladakh want a state for themselves within the Indian constitution seperate from the Sunni Muslim dominated valley since they have been neglected by the Muslim politicians from the valley and the bulk of the resources alloted for Kashmir is being hogged by the Muslim dominated areas. Interestigly even the Shias are pissed with the Sunnis from the valley.
 

7 posted on 05/02/2006 2:34:28 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Thank you. That is informative--especially with the map.


8 posted on 05/02/2006 2:51:12 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Agreed. That map is very helfpul.


9 posted on 05/02/2006 3:10:30 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan; familyop

While I have few points of agreement with the Hindu right in India,their point on partitioning Kashmir into 3 is imminently sensible.A Hindu majority in Jammu,Slammic majority in the valley & Buddhist/hindus in Ladakh is just too volatile to hand over to the terrorists in the Hurriyat & their pals in the "indegnious" political parties.There won't be an end to this problem if the state stays as it is & will only become more unstable even if it becomes independent.If an internal partition takes place,article 370 of the constitution can be thrown into the dustbin irrespective of whether the Slammics want it or not.


10 posted on 05/02/2006 3:11:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; familyop

Seperation into 3 zone can have its own set of problems.
The J&K in its present shape with all the Hindu, Muslim and Buddhist areas combined would together give a pro-India majority. If Hindu and Buddhist areas are seperated the Kashmir valley will have a pro-Pak or pro-Independence (which is the same thing) majority and it will be a big advantage for Pakistan. Pakistan can then make demands that India can keep Ladakh and Jammu while India hands over the pro-Pak majority Valley to Pakistan.

The Northern areas at one time had large number of Buddhists. Today there are almost none. Those places are almost 100% Muslim majority. And most of them are Punjabis (not even Kashmiris). Through ethnic clensing and genocide Pakistan has done the ground work that a future referandum (if taken) would give a clear Pak majority.


11 posted on 05/02/2006 3:30:10 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

You'r right on that,but it unless Delhi shows some real spine,the hindus & buddhists will keep reducing in number & will attempt to leave the state.If i recall correctly,the percentage of Muslims in Ladakh has grown by close to 10% in the last 25-30 years,which is not comforting factor.

The Northern Areas of Gilgit & Baltistan in POK offer hope to India given that these areas are dirt poor with zero democracy & widespread resentment against the Pak-Punjabi dominance.There has been more than one revolt there since the 80s,the most recent being around 2000 or so after the way the PA army allowed the Northern Light Infantry(of Kargil infamy) to be slaughtered by India & not even receiving their dead bodies.


12 posted on 05/02/2006 3:43:02 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ARridgerunner; little jeremiah

Ping!


13 posted on 05/02/2006 7:02:30 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Im sure its just another one of those misunderstandings. Maybe CAIR can tell us what to think on this one too.


14 posted on 05/02/2006 2:07:50 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make The Call.....pitchforks and lanterns.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson