Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

La. Senate passes restaurant smoking ban
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^ | May 2, 2006

Posted on 05/03/2006 5:13:08 AM PDT by SheLion

BATON ROUGE (AP) — Louisiana restaurant patrons who want an after-dinner smoke should be forced to leave the dining room before lighting up, the full Senate decided today.

Senators approved Sen. Rob Marionneaux’s plan to prohibit smoking in all restaurants’ dining areas but allow smoking in bars and casinos, cigar shops, and hotel and motel rooms. Marionneaux cited several polls conducted by anti-smoking groups showing that a majority of residents in Louisiana’s cities support such a ban.

“Let’s afford our citizens the right to have dinner with their families without the bother of second-hand smoke,” said Marionneaux, D-Livonia.

The measure passed on a 36-2 vote. Sens. Heulette “Clo” Fontenot, R-Livingston, and Max Malone, R-Shreveport, opposed the bill, which now moves to the House.

If the bill becomes law, smoking would be outlawed in restaurants beginning in 2007.

Sen. Ken Hollis filed an amendment to allow smoking inside restaurants’ bar areas, if those bars are walled off from the dining area. Hollis said suddenly banning smokers from those areas could drive restaurants out of business, because their customers will go to bars where smoking is allowed.

“This will hopefully keep some of our restaurants from going out of business,” said Hollis, R-Metairie.

Marionneaux opposed the amendment, calling it a veiled attempt to kill the measure, by drawing further opposition from the restaurant industry. Restaurant owners have complained that the bill — even without Hollis’ amendment — gives tavern owners special treatment.

Senators approved Hollis’ amendment with a 23-15 vote, sending it to the House.

The bill was also amended by Sen. Diana Bajoie, D-New Orleans, who added an exemption aimed at helping New Orleans’ convention center attract business. The amendment would allow smoking at convention space during tobacco industry trade shows.

It would also allow smoking during Mardi Gras krewes’ parties held at a convention center.

Marionneaux introduced a similar plan last year that was voted down by the full Senate, partly because it included a provision to also outlaw smoking in casinos. This year’s version exempts casinos, eliminating opposition from the powerful gambling industry and improving its chances of eventually becoming law.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; budget; butts; camel; caribou; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; epa; fda; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; pufflist; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Skooz




You are right. It is not up to the government to decide what an individual does on their own property, it's up to the property owner. If we let nanny-state dictate this, all freedom will be lost, affecting smokers and non-smokers. And it is really not right to demonize a group of people this way, for using a legal product. America has become a nation of whiners, I think.


21 posted on 05/03/2006 6:24:55 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Skooz; SheLion




You are right. It is not up to the government to decide what an individual does on their own property, it's up to the property owner. If we let nanny-state dictate this, all freedom will be lost, affecting smokers and non-smokers. And it is really not right to demonize a group of people this way, for using a legal product. America has become a nation of whiners, I think.


22 posted on 05/03/2006 6:25:21 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: moonman

"This is the beginning of the end for smokers."

The beginning of the end for freedom of choice and individual property rights. Our homes will be next on nanny's list.


23 posted on 05/03/2006 6:27:40 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Irish_Thatcherite

What do you make of this? (post 9)


24 posted on 05/03/2006 6:30:33 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

Enjoy your new smoke free restaurants if they come to pass. It becomes useless to get into a pissing contest with opponents on certain issues. Smoking is one of them. JMO.


25 posted on 05/03/2006 6:31:34 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The measure passed on a 36-2 vote.

Yes, smokers continue to win the hearts and minds of others.

Gee whiz folks.. when are you going to face the music? I used to think maybe it would take 5 more years before bans in all restaurants everywhere but now I think it will be within 3 years.

26 posted on 05/03/2006 6:31:47 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

"...a majority of residents in Louisiana’s cities support such a ban."

Mob rule. The tyranny of the majority. If 100 people gather in room and 51 vote to hang you, is that okay? Democracy inevitably evolves into a dictatorship where there is no rule by law, and the rights and freedoms of the minority are trampled by the emotions of the mob.

If these dumbclucks don't get it, look for anarchy and violence in the future followed by a dictatorship.


27 posted on 05/03/2006 6:35:53 AM PDT by sergeantdave (And though getting up in the world attracts attention, it does not establish solid worth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Wow.  Look at this!!!!!

RESULTS: ETS exposure during childhood was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] for ever exposure = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.96).

Kids exposed to SHS have a lower risk of getting lung cancer later on!

28 posted on 05/03/2006 6:38:44 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Maybe they die of heart disease (which is a bigger killer) first.


29 posted on 05/03/2006 6:40:39 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 383rr
The beginning of the end for freedom of choice and individual property rights. Our homes will be next on nanny's list.

Not all states are buckling under to the anti's:

WI: Smoking ban stalls

30 posted on 05/03/2006 6:41:30 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: winston2

Well, gabz'z description fits me to a tee. Grew up a farm kid, always in mud and cow-pens. Been a welder and mechanic for 17 1/2 years, and there's more toxic smoke at work than any cigarette could offer me,and I am hardly ever sick. Haven't been to the doctor, other than when I broke my leg in the military,(14 YEARS AGO) and for a physical last month. He says I look great all-around. I can easily keep up with my friends 18 year old son, and easily throw 1100 hay bails in the barn on a 90 degree day.I am 6'1 190 pounds, with about 15% body fat. Most sickly people I know just sit around all day doing nothing(and they say they can't do anything because they're sickly). My kids aren't sick either. I have used snuff and smoked since 1986. Make of it what you will.


31 posted on 05/03/2006 6:42:08 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Oh, I see.


32 posted on 05/03/2006 6:43:22 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
If these dumbclucks don't get it, look for anarchy and violence in the future followed by a dictatorship.

I know the feeling.  Even I, as a peace loving female, wish I could slap around a few people in FRee Republic!

33 posted on 05/03/2006 6:43:43 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=374305

This bill prohibits smoking in motor vehicles under certain circumstances.


34 posted on 05/03/2006 6:44:51 AM PDT by Ellesu (www.thedeadpelican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

WHHHHHHHHaaaaaaaTTTTTTTTZZZZZZZZUUUUPPPPPPPPP RAYYYYYYYY!!!!!!


35 posted on 05/03/2006 6:45:10 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: moonman

http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=374305


36 posted on 05/03/2006 6:45:33 AM PDT by Ellesu (www.thedeadpelican.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 383rr

37 posted on 05/03/2006 6:45:55 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Exactly right, Sarge.


38 posted on 05/03/2006 6:46:23 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
This bill prohibits smoking in motor vehicles under certain circumstances.

Did someone ask about smoking in cars?  I didn't see that here.

39 posted on 05/03/2006 6:47:35 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

You go get 'em Ray! You da man!


40 posted on 05/03/2006 6:48:37 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson