Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CellPhoneSurfer

He should get a DUI regardless. Even if the cops pretend to believe his lie about not being drunk, being under the influence of drugs is also grounds for a DUI, and he has admitted that.


12 posted on 05/06/2006 12:56:11 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ozzymandus
He should get a DUI regardless.

I agree, but unfortunately there's no physical proof of intoxication.

16 posted on 05/06/2006 1:22:03 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ozzymandus
He should get a DUI regardless.

Kennedy:
1) Was driving with his headlights off at 2:45 a.m.
2) Swerved into oncoming traffic, almost sideswiped a police cruiser, and crashed into a security barrier.
3) Was observed staggering after he exited his vehicle.
4) Smelled of alcohol.
5) Lied about being "late for a vote".
6) Lied about not having had alcohol,
7) Was seen drinking at one or two bars earlier in the evening.

I'd say that the above facts sufficiently form the basis of a case. I'm sure that the two sergeants who drove him home could provide testimony that would ice the case. No need for any test results.

83 posted on 05/06/2006 11:02:11 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Every vote for a Democrat is a vote for $10/gallon gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson