[tanknetter]

What has Senor Bush done to undo anything that Clinton did?

Oh, I don't know ... does signing a [b]BAN[/b] on partial birth abortion (repeatedly vetoed by Clinton, iirc) count?

And not only that, with "undoing" Reagan's appointment of O'Connor with Alito, there might just be a chance of it sticking.

Or maybe partial birth abortion doesn't matter to you as an issue ...

[longtermmemmory]

don't forget

two supreme court justices

codifying the fact the second amendment is an INDIVIDUAL right (contradicting the effort of leftists to create a fake collective rights BS)

and BIGGEST of all, he did not treat 9/11 as a "law enforcement issue" like bill "neutered" clinton.

[Badray]

Give me a break.

Partial birth abortion is reprehensible even to most people who are in favor of abortion. I am opposed to all abortion with the one exception being the immediate threat to the life of the mother if an abortion is not done at that moment. No exception for rape or incest.

Since Jorge lost his veto pen (apparently at one of the Inaugarl Balls) he couldn't have vetoed the bill even if he wanted to. He's never vetoed a single bill. He gets no points for me on that. Had he not signed, he would have been lynched.

O'Connor needed to be replaced, but Jorge almost put Harriet Miers in first until we had a collective fit and stopped him.

I know that you are trying hard to give him credit for something and he has done some good things, but the bad that he has done in so many areas outweigh them all.