Can you give any reason why your vetting process is superior to Michelle Malkin's? She seems to be running with this on her new endeavor "vent" which is less than two weeks old. I'd think she'd be kind of cautious with her credibility at this point.
Hmm. It could be due to the fact that I, a former police officer (medically retired after taking a bullet in one of my two favorite lungs), actually read the original article and determined that it related to consular access to arrestees and detainees (said access being regulated by treaty), which includes access to information regarding the circumstances of the arrest/detention. In other words, I combined subject matter expertise with carefully examining the text of the report.
Compare and contrast with Michelle Malkin, whose vetting process is "whatever the Minutemen say is the actual fact, period, end of discussion."
She seems to be running with this on her new endeavor "vent" which is less than two weeks old. I'd think she'd be kind of cautious with her credibility at this point.
"Cautious" does not generate viewership, which is critical for determining ad revenue.
Malkin blew her credibility when she played church lady to Laura Bush after the Correspondents Dinner last year and in her historic revisionism as she defends the internment of Japanese-Americans behind barbed wire in WWII.