Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaskan senator [Stevens] denies making wind farm deal with Kennedy
boston.com ^ | May 10, 2006 | By Rick Klein, Globe Staff

Posted on 05/10/2006 4:59:33 AM PDT by cloud8

WASHINGTON -- Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska yesterday denied cutting a special deal with Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts to block a proposed wind farm off Cape Cod.

Stevens cast his opposition to the Cape Wind proposal as an issue of states' rights.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Stevens said Kennedy went along with his proposal to hand Governor Mitt Romney, a Cape Wind opponent, the power to veto the project. Environmental groups have accused Kennedy of reaching a backroom deal with Stevens to block Cape Wind, but Stevens said he wants all states to have the final word on energy projects off their coastlines. "He, as a matter of fact, is an old friend, and it's true that Senator Kennedy and the governor of Massachusetts support the provision," said Stevens, the Senate's senior Republican.

"It is not an issue based on friendship, nor any past favors or future favors," Stevens said. "It is strictly a provision based upon my long-held belief that states should have a final say on projects that impact their land, resources, and constituents."

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bigfatted; capewind; nimby; stevens
It may be a states' rights matter, but no one has asked us about it.
1 posted on 05/10/2006 4:59:36 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: cloud8

Maybe they should change his name to 'Senator Sellout'.


3 posted on 05/10/2006 5:06:36 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DamonSt

Stevens and Kennedy, two natural gasbags.


4 posted on 05/10/2006 5:06:42 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

UNless he got Kennedy to agree to drill in Anwar then its a piss poor trade.


5 posted on 05/10/2006 5:15:19 AM PDT by Prysson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prysson

It might have been a deal for Bridge To Nowhere ("nowhere" except the Stevens family's 28 acres of vacation property).


6 posted on 05/10/2006 5:20:57 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: cloud8

Considering what a pompous windbag Kennedy is, it's perfectly logical to place a windmill farm offshore from the Kennedy compound.


8 posted on 05/10/2006 5:28:00 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

I strongly feel Anwar is a state's rights issue. Feds should not even get into Mass.


9 posted on 05/10/2006 5:54:03 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

The GOP should propose building wind farms, refineries, and nuclear plants in every liberal vacation/luxury living spot in the country from Malibu to Palm Beach. This alone could suck their resources and energy away from blocking national security issues.


10 posted on 05/10/2006 5:55:05 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor
****It might have been a deal for Bridge To Nowhere.****

Nope, no deal there, not needed. The Bridge To Nowhere has been a done deal for months now thanks to some slight of hand shenanigans.

Basically what happened was

So as you see no deal is needed. That bridge will be built.

11 posted on 05/10/2006 6:00:00 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

Don't blame the Alaska senator, blame Kennedy who preaches energy conservation and says not on my plantation. Kennedy is a terrible senator with too much power in congress. He put his drunken , drug abuse kid in next to him for the vote. Can anybody say, send Kennedy back to the compound and retire him to a rocking chair, what does he care what we pay for energy ?He has his money in the Camman islands anyway, maybe he will move there.This way his bottle of scotch won't hurt me with his votes in congress.


12 posted on 05/10/2006 6:10:52 AM PDT by betsyross1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
"It is strictly a provision based upon my long-held belief that states should have a final say on projects that impact their land, resources, and constituents."

That's good they feel that way...because we would like to grow hemp for paper here in Texas. And educating all those illegals is certainly affecting our schools. Come to think of it, those illegals are not doing our hospitals one bit of good. And there just may be a wildlife refuge or two we'd like to drill for oil in. Lot of possibilities there.
13 posted on 05/10/2006 6:20:19 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson