Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABA gives Bush nominee ‘unqualified’ rating
MSNBC & AP ^ | May 10, 2006

Posted on 05/10/2006 4:41:03 PM PDT by Altair333

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Altair333
The Clinton's throwing around their influence again?
21 posted on 05/10/2006 5:28:00 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
Wallace, 54, was ...special counsel to then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi during the impeachment trial of President Clinton in 1999.

This is why the libs at the ABA say he's "unqualified." The ABA is going to have a hard time claiming they're nonpartisan.

22 posted on 05/10/2006 5:31:26 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer; kenboy
Appointing lawyers with no judicial experience to appellate courts is fairly common. These courts do not conduct trials, so presiding over a trial court is not a very helpful experience. The perspective of an appellate judge is quite different.

Ivy League education, top law school and a SCOTUS clerkship are common credentials for an appellate nominee. Either this guy has had some problem during his legal career - or he's been found guilty of practicing law while conservative.

23 posted on 05/10/2006 5:35:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kenboy

he clerked for Rhenquist...that's probably tougher than being a judge. This guy is likely eminently qualified.


24 posted on 05/10/2006 5:36:40 PM PDT by votelife (we need 60 conservative senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

That would be a surprise.


25 posted on 05/10/2006 5:37:15 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Actually, Clarence Thomas was rated "qualified", but not "well qualified."

But the ABA at least owes an explanation to such a rating to this nominee. If they don't offer one or if the explanation is lame, then you're right: TO HELL WITH THE ABA!!!


26 posted on 05/10/2006 5:39:25 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kenboy
He's up to be an appeals court judge and he's never been a judge before. Ever. Anywhere. Not even traffic court, apparently. I'm sure there are plenty of qualified conservative judges who could be promoted to an appeals court slot -- do we really need to put guys who need on-the-job traning on the bench?

I wonder what rating the ABA gave to Judge Guido Calabresi, of the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, when Clintoon nominated him in 1994. Here is a link to his background (click on his name): http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/

Note that the total lack of any judicial experience did not prevent him from serving on what many think is the most important circuit court in the Federal System, except perhaps for the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C.

27 posted on 05/10/2006 5:41:52 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

OK. I had thought he was rated unqualified.


28 posted on 05/10/2006 5:42:51 PM PDT by sinkspur ( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
I thought they already gave that up when they downgraded Brett Kavanaugh's rating just before he faced a confirmation hearing because of the report of a hand picked DemonRAT operative.
29 posted on 05/10/2006 5:45:55 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

Ralph Neas is an idiot, Alito had a perfect rating from the ABA and Neas the Moron was A wild maniac in his opposition. What an absolutely liberal POS.


30 posted on 05/10/2006 5:56:43 PM PDT by lonedawg (why does that rag on your head say holiday inn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

Whatever the ABA's reason, I expect this kills Wallace's chances. The Dems can fillibuster and the gang of 14 will have an excuse for finding "extraordinary circumstances."


31 posted on 05/10/2006 5:59:28 PM PDT by Altair333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethics

No balls no brains trent??? This guy will run like a little sissy from any confrontation.


32 posted on 05/10/2006 5:59:55 PM PDT by slapshot (""USAF- when you absolutely, positively need it delivered on target, on time, right away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
"If the ABA rates him as unqualified, he must be a strict constitutionalist. Hire this guy immediately."

33 posted on 05/10/2006 6:06:25 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

I don't know....if he was Special Counsel to TRENT LOTT during the Clinton Impeachment trial, maybe he is unqualified?


34 posted on 05/10/2006 6:14:31 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Lucky participant in 189 different Nigerian business deals......still waiting on payment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altair333

The ABA is unqualified.


35 posted on 05/10/2006 6:15:49 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson