Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Altair333
He's up to be an appeals court judge and he's never been a judge before. Ever. Anywhere. Not even traffic court, apparently.

I'm sure there are plenty of qualified conservative judges who could be promoted to an appeals court slot -- do we really need to put guys who need on-the-job traning on the bench?
9 posted on 05/10/2006 4:51:06 PM PDT by kenboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kenboy
He's up to be an appeals court judge and he's never been a judge before. Ever. Anywhere. Not even traffic court, apparently

Um, I'm not saying we shouldn't consider (perhaps even prefer) already-sitting judges, but your formulation (effectively REQUIRING prior judicial experience) would have kept many fine judges off the appellate and SCOTUS bench, including Scalia (no judicial experience before DC Cir.), Rehnquist (none prior to SCOTUS), Kozinski (9th Circus), etc., etc., etc., etc.

I mean no offense, but that particular objection isn't a sound one.

13 posted on 05/10/2006 5:04:34 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: kenboy

When using your rules of previous judgeships, we would be without the services of some of the very best minds to ever serve as federal judges, like maybe Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas to name just a few. You need to reconsider your comments.


16 posted on 05/10/2006 5:15:29 PM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: kenboy
Does Mr. Wallace have any appellate experience as a practitioner? That would be most relevant.

Since the role of an appellate judge and a trial judge are quite different, I do not think being a trial judge is the end-all be-all requisite for being an appellate judge.

17 posted on 05/10/2006 5:21:27 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: kenboy
He's up to be an appeals court judge and he's never been a judge before. Ever. Anywhere. Not even traffic court, apparently.

He was a law clerk for Chief Justice Rehnquist. That means he wrote Rehnquist's Supreme Court opinions. He's qualified. Perhaps over qualified.
18 posted on 05/10/2006 5:21:30 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: kenboy

he clerked for Rhenquist...that's probably tougher than being a judge. This guy is likely eminently qualified.


24 posted on 05/10/2006 5:36:40 PM PDT by votelife (we need 60 conservative senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: kenboy
He's up to be an appeals court judge and he's never been a judge before. Ever. Anywhere. Not even traffic court, apparently. I'm sure there are plenty of qualified conservative judges who could be promoted to an appeals court slot -- do we really need to put guys who need on-the-job traning on the bench?

I wonder what rating the ABA gave to Judge Guido Calabresi, of the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, when Clintoon nominated him in 1994. Here is a link to his background (click on his name): http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/

Note that the total lack of any judicial experience did not prevent him from serving on what many think is the most important circuit court in the Federal System, except perhaps for the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C.

27 posted on 05/10/2006 5:41:52 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson