Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Raises Spectre Of Cold War With Threat Of Arms Race
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-11-2006 | Nick Allen - Alec Russell

Posted on 05/10/2006 5:59:16 PM PDT by blam

Putin raises spectre of Cold War with threat of arms race

By Nick Allen in Moscow and Alec Russell in Washington
(Filed: 11/05/2006)

Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, raised the spectre of the Cold War yesterday, likening the United States to a voracious wolf and declaring that the arms race was not yet over.

Vladimir Putin: the arms race ‘is rising to a new technological level’

With relations between Moscow and Washington at their most strained in many years, Mr Putin used his annual state of the nation speech to revive Russia's military rivalry with the United States.

"It is premature to speak of the end of the arms race," he said in his televised address to the Russian people. "Moreover, it is going faster today. It is rising to a new technological level."

Seeking to portray the United States as Russia's main adversary, Mr Putin pointed out that Moscow's military budget was 25 times lower than Washington's. He said that would have to change if foreign attempts to interfere in Russian policy were to be warded off.

"We must always be ready to counter any attempts to pressure Russia," he said.

"The stronger our military is, the less temptation there will be to exert such pressure on us."

Spending is to increase on both conventional forces and the so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-based strategic weapons, he said.

Two new nuclear-powered submarines armed with Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missiles would soon go into service, the first to be built since 1990, Mr Putin noted as one example.

Meanwhile the mostly conscript-based army must fill two thirds of its ranks with professionals by 2008. Russia's military will reportedly receive £12.3 billion this year, £2 billion more than in 2005.

Mr Putin's annual address is always meticulously dissected by Kremlinologists seeking clues for Russia's direction over the coming 12 months. This year's speech comes just six days after Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, accused the Kremlin of backsliding on democracy and blackmailing its neighbours in one of the most scathing attacks on Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The Russian press compared Mr Cheney's criticisms to Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" speech in 1946 and said it heralded the dawn of a new Cold War.

Mr Putin's trenchant remarks went down badly in Washington, where officials also expressed their concern with Moscow's stance over Iran's nuclear program.

Russia, backed by China, is blocking any chance of agreement on a resolution on Iran, arguing that a text proposed by western powers could be interpreted as the first step towards military action.

American officials were bridling over the uncompromising attitude of Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, at Monday night's critical and unsuccessful talks in New York between Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, and the foreign ministers of Germany, France, Britain, Russia and China.

In a sign of the rising political pressure over Russia, Senator John McCain, the Republican front-runner to succeed George W Bush in the White House, launched a broadside against the Kremlin.

"There has been a steady retrogression and a sort of an effort to restore the old Soviet Empire," he told CBS television.

The Russian leader accused the Bush administration of sacrificing the democratic ideals it claimed to cherish when they conflicted with national self-interest.

"Where is all this pathos about protecting human rights and democracy when it comes to the need to pursue their own interests? Here, it seems, everything is allowed and there are no restrictions whatsoever.

"We are aware of what is going on in the world. Comrade Wolf knows whom to eat, he eats without listening and he's clearly not going to listen to anyone."

But he stressed that Russia's foreign policy was based on "pragmatism, predictability and observance of international law".


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: arms; cold; coldwar2; putin; race; raises; spectre; threat; war

1 posted on 05/10/2006 5:59:19 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
"Senator John McCain, the Republican front-runner to succeed George W Bush in the White House, launched a broadside against the Kremlin.

"There has been a steady retrogression and a sort of an effort to restore the old Soviet Empire," he told CBS television.

Occasionally McCain gets SOMETHING correct.

(That doesn't mean I'd ever vote for him though.)

2 posted on 05/10/2006 6:05:58 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
arms race

Been there, done that... Will do again if necessary... Result will be same...

Sorry... Again...

3 posted on 05/10/2006 6:12:43 PM PDT by mmercier (so it goes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What a pipsqueak weasel!!


4 posted on 05/10/2006 6:30:05 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I'm a proud GRINGO......is Bill Clinton still the president?...Seems that way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Yep. Anyone who actually thought that the Russians were our friends after the "fall" of the Soviet Union was, and is, kidding themselves big time.


5 posted on 05/10/2006 6:34:00 PM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

Russia + Iran = Human rights commission???


6 posted on 05/10/2006 7:19:20 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
Yep. Anyone who actually thought that the Russians were our friends after the "fall" of the Soviet Union was, and is, kidding themselves big time.

Didn't Clinton give Putin the nickname, "Putie Put"?

7 posted on 05/10/2006 7:29:21 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

8 posted on 05/10/2006 7:32:13 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

An arms race! LOL!


9 posted on 05/10/2006 7:33:40 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

If Hillary and Mclame end up being the only 2 choices.

Will you:

A. Go fishing?

B. Go to the beach?


10 posted on 05/10/2006 7:36:24 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
C. Vote for the glory-hound squish who is a hawk, instead of the glory-hound red who is a traitor.
11 posted on 05/10/2006 7:47:02 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Works for me :)


12 posted on 05/10/2006 7:52:03 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
Putin lashes out at 'wolf-like' America

· Response to Cheney attack feeds war of words
· US 'eats and listens to no one', warns president

Nick Paton Walsh in Moscow and Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Thursday May 11, 2006
The Guardian (UK)

Relations between the US and Russia sank to the lowest point in a decade yesterday when Vladimir Putin harshly rebuked Washington for its criticism last week and compared the US to a hungry wolf that "eats and listens to no one". Mr Putin, stung by an attack from Dick Cheney, the US vice-president, used his annual state of the nation address to denounce US expansionism and military spending. He also questioned Washington's record on democratic rights. Although he refrained from mentioning the US by name, it was clear that the "wolf" in question referred to Washington.

The deterioration in relations is risky for the US at a time when it is trying to persuade Russia to support a United Nations resolution against Iran over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The acrimony will also encourage senior US Republicans such as John McCain to renew calls for Mr Bush to boycott this year's meeting of the Group of Eight, the world's wealthiest countries, which is scheduled to be held in Russia for the first time.

The war of words is a long way from the optimism with which George Bush said, after his first face-to-face meeting with Mr Putin in 2001, that he had looked into the Russian president's soul and liked what he saw.

Mr Cheney, reflecting Washington's growing disenchantment, told a conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, last week that Russia was sending "mixed signals" over democracy, as well as using its energy resources to "intimidate and blackmail" neighbours.

Mr Putin, in his speech, noted that the American military budget was 25 times the size of Russia's and said the US had turned its home into a castle.

"Good for them," the Russian president said, looking up from his notes, directly at his audience, "but this means we must make our own home strong and reliable. Because we see what is happening in the world. We see it."

He added, in what appeared to be a reference to the US-led invasion of Iraq and its approach to Iran: "As they say, 'comrade wolf knows whom to eat. He eats without listening and he is clearly not going to listen to anyone'." He accused the US of hypocrisy over its criticism of Russia's patchy human rights record.

"Where is all this pathos about protecting human rights and democracy when it comes to the need to pursue their own interests?"

In another veiled reference to Washington's approach to Iraq and Iran, he said: "Methods of force rarely give the desired result and often their consequences are even more terrible than the original threat." He added that Russia was "unambiguously" against the spread of nuclear weapons.

In another apparent jibe aimed at the US, he said countries should not use Russia's negotiations over membership of the World Trade Organisation to make unrelated demands.

"The negotiations for letting Russia into the WTO should not become a bargaining chip for questions that have nothing in common with the activities of this organisation," Mr Putin said.

US senators visiting Moscow last month said Congress would consider its application in the light of Russia's behaviour on human rights and Iran.

Mr Putin said Russia had to resist foreign pressure by bolstering its army, which is currently a ragtag group of a million conscripts galvanised by special forces and nuclear weapons. "We must always be ready to counter any attempts to pressure Russia in order to strengthen positions at our expense," he said. "The stronger our military is, the less temptation there will be to exert such pressure on us."

Much of his hour-long address was dedicated to Russia's demographic plight, which some forecasts have suggested could see the population fall from 142 million to 100 million by 2050. "The number of our citizens shrinks by an average of 700,000 people a year," he said, promising to double state payouts for a first child to £30 a month, with £60 for a second one. He said a healthy population, free from the vices of smoking and drinking, was vital for a healthy army to protect the state.

Boris Makarenko, deputy head of the Centre for Political Technologies, said the speech marked the beginning of a new approach in which Russia, bolstered by high oil and gas prices, had stopped discussing democracy and other issues with the west and had said instead: "We are strong, we have wealth and we'll use it in a way we consider necessary."

Mr Makarenko said the bitter exchange between Washington and Moscow during the past week was designed to get their mutual criticisms out of the way prior to Russia chairing the G8 summit in St Petersburg in July.

13 posted on 05/10/2006 8:10:36 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Now the Russians are getting smart. They've seen the "free traders" build the Chi-Com war machine.

During Cold War I Americans would not allow "free traders" build the Soviet economy -- even though the "free traders" said that if we didn't help the Soviets to develop we'd be playing into the hands of Communist hardliners, there would be war, and it would be America's (who else?) fault.

Cold War II and the "free traders" are in charge and ramping up their free tradin' transfer of technology, wealth, and production to yet another enemy (close enough to one, IMO).

14 posted on 05/10/2006 8:22:13 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonymoussierra; Grzegorz 246; lizol; Lukasz

ping


15 posted on 05/10/2006 9:05:58 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Comrade Wolf knows whom to eat, he eats without listening and he's clearly not going to listen to anyone." Pootie-Poot

"Moscow's military budget was 25 times lower than Washington's."

Russians Successfully Launch New Sub-Based ICBM

NEW RUSSIAN ICBM HAS CLINTON ROOTS

New Iranian reactor will be built to Russian designs

Et cetera.

"When dancing with a bear, keep your ax handy." Russian proverb.

16 posted on 05/10/2006 11:39:15 PM PDT by Daaave (Use only as directed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson