Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
Deciding to charge or not charge a federal suspect is the purview of the executive branch.

Luttig is trying to sound high-minded when all he's really doing is grabbing for the brass ring at Boeing.

5 posted on 05/11/2006 2:03:49 PM PDT by sinkspur ( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
The elites doing their thing. Throwing tantrums when they don't get their way.

Bye bye Luttig.

Truth be told he was not going to be getting on the USSC anytime soon.

The next appointment will be a conservative woman.

9 posted on 05/11/2006 2:34:42 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur; MNJohnnie; Congressman Billybob; kristinn; Publius
Deciding to charge or not charge a federal suspect is the purview of the executive branch.

Indeed it is. But to abandon the high ground after a key legal victory is won at personal cost in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal is neither seemly, intelligent or particularly worthy of this Administration.

Luttig is trying to sound high-minded when all he's really doing is grabbing for the brass ring at Boeing.

Actually, his resignation speech can be found here and he is in fact saying nothing about any disagreements or disappointments with the administration's sudden and embarassing reversal of its legal handling of the Padilla case.

There are other readings of the judicial tea leaves in his resignation here

11 posted on 05/11/2006 2:37:55 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Deciding to charge or not charge a federal suspect is the purview of the executive branch.

Deciding whether or not this Federal suspect is kept in custody indefinitely -- or has his case adjudicated in a manner that doesn't meet Constitutional scrutiny -- is not.

19 posted on 05/11/2006 3:09:21 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson