Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross

Why do the eventual criminal charges against Padilla undercut any claim that the executive has said power? That doesn't make sense to me.


8 posted on 05/11/2006 2:29:16 PM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: dinoparty
Why do the eventual criminal charges against Padilla undercut any claim that the executive has said power? That doesn't make sense to me.

The Administration seems to lack the courage of its supposed legal convictions.

And if they refuse to follow through in this case...effectively they are creating a defacto defeat for their advocacy of executive war powers.

13 posted on 05/11/2006 2:42:28 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dinoparty
Think of the Rush Limbaugh case, where the prosecutor went to great lengths in various courts to pursue (and then make public) Rush's medical records, ostensibly on the grounds that these were part of a major investigation into some serious drug-peddling operation.

When the prosecutor ultimately filed minimal charges involving a minor case of prescription drug possession, Rush had every reason to be p!ssed off to no end about the prosecutor's conduct -- and any judge with an ounce of credibility would toss the prosecutor out of his courtroom.

20 posted on 05/11/2006 3:13:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson