Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thinking of Throwing a Tantrum in November?
Shameless Vanity | 5-11-06 | Burr5

Posted on 05/11/2006 8:25:42 PM PDT by Burr5

There has been a rising tide of opinion expressed these last few days on Talk Radio regarding the impulse to vote against Republicans in the upcoming congressional election in order to punish them for their whorish pandering to illegal aliens, their fiscal irresponsibility, and their general disregard of the demands of the conservative base. I have heard echoes of this on Rush Limbaugh, Mike Gallagher, Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Rielly.

We should be worried about this attitude. Especially those of us who remember 1992. In George H.W. Bush's second presidential attempt, a conservative rebellion (over tax policy) and the insurgent candidacy of a purported "economic conservative" (Ross Perot), resulted in the election of the most venal, irresponsible, demogogic criminal in the history of American politics. 43% of the electorate was enough to give us eight years of Clinton.

So would sitting this one out, or voting for a Libertarian get us closer to where we want to be? Everyone realizes that a conservative temper tantrum at the polls will only serve to grant power to the Democrats. Would this "teach the Republicans a lesson"?

Perhaps. But where would we be then? We are at war. The Democrats believe the war is Bush's fault. 9-11 was an aberation. It will not happen again even if we don't listen in on Al-Qaeda's phone conversations. We will be safe if we pull out of Iraq. There will NEVER be a justification for bombing Iran's nuclear facilities. There will be no more war for oil, and yet the Caribou in ANWR will still be safe from the predations of Exxon-Mobil.

Domestically, we can expect the likes of Charles Rangle and Ron "Red" Dellums to hold the reins of power in the House of Representatives. The Bush economy will not be destroyed; things will simply become more "fair" for women and minorities.

And, of course, the great gains we are making in the corrupt, tyrannical judiciary will come to a screeching halt. If you're alright with the "right" of irresponsible young women to hire doctors to shove a metal implement into the skull of their partially born babies, and to have them crack open the skulll, vacuum out the brain matter as the tiny arms silently flap around, and then throw the corpse into the trash, then the make-up of congress may not be of much importance to you when the next confirmation hearing comes around. Chairman Leahy- Say no more.

Politics is a TEAM SPORT, ladies and gentlemen, and one does not express one's dissatisfaction with the team's effort by aiding the opposing team.

Do not let the party of treason, greed, corruption, infanticide, demogougerey, hypocricy and judicial tyranny gain power.

It could take another forty years to get it back.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; lesserevil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-580 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2006 8:25:44 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Burr5

I have a novel idea. How about the Republicans in Washington not give their base a reason to do such things.

Just a thought.


2 posted on 05/11/2006 8:27:22 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Would this "teach the Republicans a lesson"?

Who even cares any more. They had their chance and they blew it. Only insane people keep doing the same thing and expect a different result. Time to try something new.

3 posted on 05/11/2006 8:30:47 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

I'm with you. My point is......well the alternative isn't good.


4 posted on 05/11/2006 8:31:05 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Read my lips, if they reward, aid and abet criminals by giving them voting status, there will no longer be an America.

They will be fighting over who will be the family to rule North America.
5 posted on 05/11/2006 8:31:14 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
i think they are in a 'catch 22' where they cannot please their base and cannot please their moneymen
6 posted on 05/11/2006 8:31:32 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
I have to admit, I am thinking of doing this. The one thing many politicians count on, is that they can do whatever they please, and the base will in the end vote for them because the alternative is worse. I can't go along with this. I will only vote Republican if the border situation is solved.
7 posted on 05/11/2006 8:32:07 PM PDT by TechnicalEcstacy (Ann Coulter - want to touch the heiny - aaoowwwooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
["Politics is a TEAM SPORT."]

Yes, and it's also a contact sport. I happen to like big people such as Charlie Rangle...when they fall they more noise.
8 posted on 05/11/2006 8:32:43 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5

If the 'Pubbies don't get with the program, they will go down to ignominious defeat in November, and they will deserve every bit of it.


9 posted on 05/11/2006 8:33:10 PM PDT by bondjamesbond (Rice 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Agreeded. I am for the Bush plan on illegal immigration here. I realize many are not. However, if one has displeasure at ones congressman and how they vote you voice that opinion in the primaries. Better yet people get out and work in the trenches for their candidate. At the end of the day no matter who wins we pull together behind the the Republican that wins. Its a pretty good system. The rhetoric on this immigration issue and others has anyone that happens to disagree on certain aspects labled a RHINO. I nominate that as the most overused word of the year. Sen Brownback for instance a RHINO? I think not.
10 posted on 05/11/2006 8:33:48 PM PDT by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
i think they are in a 'catch 22' where they cannot please their base and cannot please their moneymen

Then I guess they have to consider the unthinkable - do the right thing.

11 posted on 05/11/2006 8:33:52 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Burr5

Don't forget that if the Republicans lose the majority, amnesty WILL get passed!!!


12 posted on 05/11/2006 8:34:35 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Agreed. They blow illegal immigration and come November they are toast. And it will be their fault, NOT MINE.


13 posted on 05/11/2006 8:34:44 PM PDT by steel_resolve (BUSH IS WHACK ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Nancy Palosi, Speaker of the House.

Now that would be some real nasty punishment.

14 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:04 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Is tractus pro pensio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
"well the alternative isn't good."

I agree completely. They still have time to turn things around in DC, they need to get busy.

15 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:09 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

And again, if the Pubbies go down, what do you think the alternative is going to be? DO you think the opposition is going to address ANY of the conservative issues that might be dear to you???


16 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:12 PM PDT by bushsupporter30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Burr5

I agree with you 100%.

But try this experiment -- ask people, not what they think about "Congress" but about their own representatives.

The answers are different, is my experience.


17 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:17 PM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
["Politics is a TEAM SPORT."]

Yes, and it's also a contact sport. I happen to like big people such as Charlie Rangle...when they fall they make more noise. (Sorry for the double post.)
18 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:18 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

i agree, just stating what i thought was reality


19 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:27 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TechnicalEcstacy

Great you do that and I'll have to vote twice.

I can you know, I live in Florida, the democratic section.


20 posted on 05/11/2006 8:35:55 PM PDT by usmcobra (Those that are incited to violence by the sight of OUR flag are the enemies of this nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-580 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson