Posted on 05/12/2006 5:47:27 PM PDT by ohioWfan
2. Advise legislators that if they continue to selectively permit laws to be violated with no consequence, that we the taxpayers of America will no longer be paying our taxes. If 11 or 12 million taxpayers say "NO MORE", maybe that would get congress' attention. I would presume that if they can't find and deport 11 million illegals, they could not find or imprison 11 million tax delinquents. RIGHT!
Annex Mexico? LOL! Not a bad suggestion, Raster.
Widespread ridicule would end crap like this in a heartbeat. Rush used to be the master, but he's cruising to retirement, apparently.
But I'll wait and see what the President has to say Monday night.
L
Trublu, I think we're assuming he is going to move in our direction ... and if he does it will be important not to entirely reject the overture.
If we're wrong, and he goes on national TV just to rub McCain/Kennedy in the faces of conservatives ... nothing we can do here will save him or the Republicans.
"That's another thing that has to stop is these myths and demonization of business."
That's BS Dane.
Hiring an illegal is just as criminal as being one.
There are lot's of jobs being lost to illegals.
Maybe an "off the books" worker IS making $20.00 / hour, but if you know anything about running a business, you know that wages are just a part of what an employer pays.
No, the employer is just as culpable as the employee.
I think we all have a good idea where he is headed.
He is the president for another couple of yrs so we are going to have to work with and craft around it.
I am more hard core than I have stated but I also live in the world of reality and the - I am picking up my marbles and going home attitude I see on FR and dividing the republican party to put democrats in power who will in turn
open the border big time with no hope of ever stopping.
He probably won't say too much. The border governors are already lining up in opposition to troops. Arnie just came out against it and the others will follow.
We have a new Mayor in NJ's largest city. He will try to do the right thing. All the powers that be are lined up against him.
Mayor Blooming-idiot in NYC just loves the illegals. Keeps saying how much they bring to the city. How they bring more money than they cost.
Mayor Blooming-idiot lies thru his teeth.
If there is a federal law against allowing anchor babies in school that may help but I don't know if that is constitutional.
It's a monumental problem.
I think your conclusion is right, and the other steps look valid to me at first glance.
Now how do WE help implement them in the real world?
You're on the edge tru....... state your positive suggestions for what we can do, please.
"No, the employer is just as culpable as the employee."
I agree they share equally in the illegal contract.
The purpose of the thread is to be civil. Something getting more and more rare these days.
There is no immigration problem. If you truly believe this is a free country, then you must believe in open immigration; else you are just somewhere along the road to police statism and national IDs, with an asterisk perpetually attached to the word "liberty." Or perhaps you are merely infected by anti-Hispanicism.
End of thread!
Do they have a SS card?
Do they have a Green Card?
Can they produce a birth certificate?
Do they have a valid DL?
Prospective employees have to satisfy the requirements of an I-9 form, why not folks who are demanding thousands and thousands of dollars of medical care?
If they can't produce any of the above documents, then throw a call into the BP and have them rounded up as soon as they're healthy enough to transport.
L
At least we're beginning with a good idea. Well done, Ohio!
I agree with this too. I think if they are here and allowed to be here by the non-enforcement of our laws, we have a moral obligation not to turn them away when they are ill. Try sitting in a crowded ER, with very ill folks, and try to sort out the "are you legal" issue. Would break my heart. This problem will subside once the flow is curtailed, and remedies put in place.
I know, a bit extreme, but if nothing else works and Fox won't enforce rule of law in his own country, why should we hold back.
It's about sovereignty. They ignore US sovereignty, but in the same breath declare sovereinty over US territory (California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas), so why should we hold back? Sounds like a declaration of war by weenies not willing to fight for it.
Arnold just stated opposition to troops so the border governors are going to block it. I can't think of one of them that would support this especially in an election year. It's one thing to say that legal Hispanics are against illegal Hispanics but quite another to see troops rounding them up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.