[ohioWfan]

Of course.

But I've never had to make that choice because most 'RINO's' (overused until it's meaning has been beaten out of it), are actually pro-life.

I'd rather have ANY Senator who is with conservatives 70-80% of the time, to having one who is NEVER with me.

The question as to whether to vote for a RINO or let a leftist win is a no-brainer. A conservative goes with the one closest to his views, and that is NEVER a leftist.

[Das Outsider]

A conservative goes with the one closest to his views, and that is NEVER a leftist.

True enough. There is no such thing as a pro-life leftist; however, there are pro-life Democrats. There are also Republicans (a small segment) who are either softly pro-abortion or take what they see as a neutral stance (read: cowardice). I can't even consider voting for any such candidate, regardless of the alternative because in the end, you declare before the world and God that the slaughter of unborn children really isn't that big of a deal--now tax cuts, that's a different story!

I am glad that, as you mentioned, most Republicans (RINO or otherwise) are still pro-life. It seems better to me to go with consistent pro-lifers that might not be so good on other issues: I'm funny like that. ;)