Replies

To: MaineVoter2002

President Bush should face impeachment if he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq (as he indeed did) or if he broke the law in ordering the National Security Agency to spy on Americans (which he admits he did).

He did?

4 posted on 05/14/2006 2:57:16 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Stay home in November and let the Democrats build that wall lickety split!)

If Bush had told us Saddam had WMD for sure, I'd have hesitated to send in ground troops. WMD only became an issue to decide that we should go into Iraq sooner rather than later. The democrats even have the WH and Rush Limbaugh believing their WMD lies. We went there because of Saddam's terrorist activities (which, in a post 911 world, trumps WMD) and his refusal to abide by the cease-fire agreement.

But even if they dont get him on this, they'll try to impeach him for trying to connect the dots and if they fail on that they'll try to impeach him for failing to connect dots. They're nasty!

9 posted on 05/14/2006 3:03:58 AM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)

dims don't let facts get in the way of what they want.

33 posted on 05/14/2006 4:06:49 AM PDT by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)

President Bush should face impeachment if he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq (as he indeed did) or if he broke the law in ordering the National Security Agency to spy on Americans (which he admits he did).

He did?

Bush undoubtedly had more reasons for invading Iraq than he found it necessary to candidly reveal. But then, he gave more reasons at the time than this writer is willing to admit. It wasn't "all about WMD."

Simple logic (slightly too simple). Bush does admit that

the NSA is checking phone records to find out who is talking to al Qaeda suspects. And that
NSA is listening in on conversations between al Qaeda suspects abroad and people in America without taking the time to get search warrants. And that
there is a law which purports to forbid that.

QED. Except for one minor thing: that portion of the law has been held to be unconstitutional. It is exactly as if Bush's critics were claiming (not that they ever would) that notwithstanding Roe v. Wade, abortion is illegal in Alabama if the state law against abortion was never repealed by the Alabama Legislature.

34 posted on 05/14/2006 4:14:18 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794