Posted on 05/14/2006 12:15:48 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
JERUSALEM - Israel's high court Sunday narrowly upheld a controversial law that restricts the right of Palestinians to live in Israel with their Arab Israeli spouses and children.
The law, imposed in 2002 at the height of Israeli-Palestinian fighting, is believed to have kept hundreds, and possibly thousands, of West Bank and Gaza Palestinians from moving to Israel to live with their families.
The law states that only Palestinian women over the age of 25 and men over 35 are eligible to join their families in Israel and eventually receive citizenship. A panel judges voted 6-5 against a petition to strike it down.
"This is a very black day for the state of Israel and also a black day for my family and for the other families who are suffering like us," said Murad el-Sana, an Israeli Arab attorney married to a Palestinian woman from the West Bank town of Bethlehem.
"The government is preventing people from conducting a normal family life just because of their nationality," el-Sana, one of the petitioners, told Israel Radio.
The court had granted el-Sana's wife, Abir, a temporary injunction preventing her deportation. But el-Sana said the high court's ruling made it almost impossible for the couple and their two children, aged 2 years and five months, to continue living together.
The government argues the legislation is based on security concerns, but the restrictions also cut to a sensitive demographic issue — the fear that Israel's Jewish majority could be threatened if too many Palestinians were granted citizenship.
In an indication of the issue's divisiveness, the 11 judges took the unusual step of writing their own opinions.
State Prosecutor Yochi Genesim said the state has granted 6,000 of 22,000 requests for family unification since Israel and the Palestinians signed an interim peace deal in 1993. The remainder were rejected, some for security reasons, Genesim said.
Genesim said the law was necessary to prevent Palestinians from using Israeli residency or citizenship to carry out attacks against Israelis. "Today the war is conducted on the home front. You need creative ways to combat that," she said.
Israeli Arabs are free to travel freely throughout the country, something that is difficult, and sometimes impossible, for West Bank and Gaza Palestinians.
Zehava Galon, a lawmaker for the dovish Meretz Party, slammed the high court's decision as racist.
"We thought that the Supreme Court would be the last bastion and unfortunately, it failed in its mission," Galon told The Associated Press. "The Supreme Court could have taken a braver decision and not relegate us to the domain of an apartheid state."
Orna Kohn, an attorney from Adalah, a group that fights for the rights of Israeli Arabs, said the court's ruling trampled on the basic rights of thousands of people.
"The bottom line is the Supreme Court of Israel refused to intervene with a law that is racist," Kohn told The Associated Press.
A Palestinian militant holds the national flag during a Fatah movement rally ahead of the 58th anniversary of the Nakba (Day of catastrophe) outside Buraj refugee camp in Gaza May 14, 2006. Palestinians mark the Nakba as a day of mourning for the establishment of Israel in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war which led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. REUTERS/Suhaib Salem
Palestinian approach: murder as many Jews as possible.
Anyone else besides the NY Times see a basic difference in how the Jews and Arabs approach a subject? /s
Oh yes, the family can live together, just not in Israel.
Move your Palestinian selves to Saudi Arabia. They love you folks even more since the 1991 pep rally for Saddam.
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
You can only imagine how Saudi Arabia would accommodate Jewish spouses of Saudi nationals.
Actually the only difference is that the former are citizens of Israel with full rights of citizenship. You never hear about this from the people who attack Israel for "apartheid."
Granted, not deporting the entire population at the first opportunity was monumentally stupid, but . . .
The article said -- ""The bottom line is the Supreme Court of Israel refused to intervene with a law that is racist," Kohn told The Associated Press."
Ahhh..., The Israeli Supreme Court did not force Israel to commit self-inflicted suicide."
For those who want to get rid of Israel, that is indeed, bad news!
Regards,
Star Traveler
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.