Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medicare Part D sign-ups surpass all expectations
Providence Business News ^ | 05/13/2006 | Marion Davis

Posted on 05/15/2006 10:38:48 AM PDT by syriacus

When Mike Leavitt first came to Rhode Island last summer to promote the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit, the feeling across the country was that the new program was so complex, that millions of seniors would just avoid it. Flanked by local officials at a Warwick senior center, the Health and Human Services secretary tried to assuage everyone’s concerns in advance.

“If you’re a senior, don’t worry,” he said. “There will be plenty of people to help you.”

It turns out that despite all the confusion, and all the bad publicity at the beginning of the year when some enrollees’ coverage didn’t work, most seniors weren’t scared off at all. In a conference call on Wednesday, with just six days before the May 15 sign-up deadline, Leavitt announced that Medicare Part D enrollment hadn’t just surpassed early predictions of 28 million to 30 million: It had already passed 37 million and was still rising.

“With the help of so many, we’ve been able to make history,” Leavitt said, adding that, if all went well, 90 percent of eligible seniors could be enrolled by the deadline.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not release updated state-by-state figures, but as of April 18, 127,020 of Rhode Island’s 176,960 Medicare beneficiaries – 72 percent – had prescription coverage, according to the Medicare Rx Access Network of Rhode Island, an alliance that is promoting the program.

At that point, coverage nationwide was at 70 percent (as of May 8, when Leavitt’s numbers were tallied, it had surpassed 86 percent), so Brian Cresta, regional administrator for Medicare, said Rhode Island’s numbers likely have kept rising as well. “Nationally, we’ve been enrolling about 650,000 people a week,” Cresta said.

CMS figures as of April 27 show that about 44,500 Rhode Islanders had enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans, with the biggest share – 20.7 percent – going to UnitedHealthcare, which has marketed its plans through the AARP and produced a widely distributed Part D guide.

Humana Insurance Co., which offered the lowest-priced plan, for $7.32 a month, seized a 17.8-percent market share, while Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island had 13.5 percent. But Rhode Island is an unusual market, officials say, because Medicare Advantage plans are extra-popular here. As of April 27, 49,400 seniors in the state were in such plans, 70 percent of them with Blue Cross and 29.4 percent of them with United. (The balance of those covered, a CMS spokeswoman said, are getting prescription coverage from other sources.)

Cresta said the biggest help with enrollment has been “word-of-mouth” from seniors who’ve found the benefit works well for them. Not that CMS would rely on word-of-mouth alone: 46,000 outreach events have been held nationwide, 1,000 of them last week.

The Medicare Rx Access Network held its own educational and promotional event on Monday at the East Providence Senior Center, and Lt. Gov. Charles J. Fogarty, who is heavily involved in elderly affairs, co-hosted a meeting with legislative leaders at a senior center in Pawtucket on Wednesday, “This is a work in progress,” Fogarty said in an interview. “There are clearly some issues that still need to be worked out. … But we believe that a proper use of the program cannot only help keep people healthy, but can also save money – direct state dollars.”

At least some seniors are already saving money, Monday’s event showed. Beverly Gofton, of Warwick, who is diabetic said even after paying her premium, she’s saving $95 a month. “Last December, I paid $147 for my monthly supply of insulin,” she said. “In January, I went back with my card, and I only paid a $28 co-pay.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: happyseniors; medicare; medicared; medicarepartd; prescriptiondrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
I enrolled my mother last week. The medicare.gov website helped greatly in determining which plan she should join. If we are unhappy with the plan we can switch in about 6 months. It looks like she will be saving about $3000 a year.

I only wish I had not tried comparing plans on my own, but had gone directly to medicare.gov and entered her prescriptions there to see which plan in our area was best for her. If I had done that last January she would be $1000 richer

1 posted on 05/15/2006 10:38:54 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: syriacus
This is turning out to be a disaster for the Dem's. The seniors are happy with the program, the cost actuals are coming in lower than anticipated, and AARP is making a ton of money on it, so they are increasingly in the GOP pocket.

Unfortunately, just recently, Bush has been making some rumblings of screwing the whole thing up and moving to price controls.
2 posted on 05/15/2006 10:43:36 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus

This is turning out to be a disaster for the Dem's.....

***

Not according to the mainstream media. All weekend I heard how there were x number of seniors still not signed up.


3 posted on 05/15/2006 10:48:14 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

ping


4 posted on 05/15/2006 10:48:20 AM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

And why wouldn't they sign up for welfare for seniors ? Payments courtesy of a taxpayer near you.


5 posted on 05/15/2006 10:48:28 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus

We need wide open, pedal to the metal competition. That alone will reduce prices.


6 posted on 05/15/2006 10:48:54 AM PDT by sine_nomine (No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daus

right - the AARP is in the GOP's pocket just as long as the GOP provides more handouts to seniors.


7 posted on 05/15/2006 10:50:00 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Would you give me the exact link you used to compare plans and save money. I am not finding it at the moment. My wife is in the $53 a month Humana plan.


8 posted on 05/15/2006 10:52:20 AM PDT by sine_nomine (No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Medicare Part D sign-ups surpass all expectations

I certainly expected it to be a hit.

When you steal from one person and give the loot to someone else, the person receiving the stolen booty can be expected to sign up for it.

9 posted on 05/15/2006 10:53:30 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
All weekend I heard how there were x number of seniors still not signed up.

Me, too. This article says that, by last Wednesday, 37 million seniors were enrolled. Leavitt says he expects 90% of eligible seniors to be enrolled by the deadline.

From the bit of news I have heard today, I would have thought that only 10% of eligible seniors had enrolled and 90% were unenrolled.

10 posted on 05/15/2006 10:53:57 AM PDT by syriacus (WHERE has Geo. Clooney been for ALL the years that Franklin Graham has been helping the Sudanese?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Unfortunately, just recently, Bush has been making some rumblings of screwing the whole thing up and moving to price controls.

How can you screw up a screw up?

All wealth transfer schemes are screwed up by definition.

LBJ would be a Republican if he were still alive.

11 posted on 05/15/2006 10:57:06 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cinives
And why wouldn't they sign up for welfare for seniors ?

"Welfare" is usually for poor people. This is a generational wealth transfer scheme.

It's government theft, courtesy of GWB and his Republican and Democratic cronies.

12 posted on 05/15/2006 10:59:14 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
How can you screw up a screw up?

Well, you can screw it up more.

I work in this industry and see what's going on first hand. I'm not a fan of this legislation, but there has been a delicate dance going on trying to find a way to avoid HillaryCare and complete price controls. Part-D was effective at staving that off, and then to hear Bush himself put it back on the table was disheartening.
13 posted on 05/15/2006 11:04:36 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Daus; cinives

"...AARP is making a ton of money on it, so they are increasingly in the GOP pocket."

Not a snowball's chance in hell. They're lib-dem trash, through and through. The GOPers have no place at their table.


14 posted on 05/15/2006 11:06:53 AM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Some more background on this...

Rx proposal ascending
15 posted on 05/15/2006 11:08:03 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
"If you’re an senior,ILLEGAL don’t worry,” he said. “There will be plenty of people to help you.”

There, it's fixed!

16 posted on 05/15/2006 11:09:26 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus
I'm not a fan of this legislation,

I hope not. What would you be in favor of, if anything?

but there has been a delicate dance going on trying to find a way to avoid HillaryCare and complete price controls.

Two groups of socialists/fascists negotiating the sell out of Indivdual liberty and personal responsibility.

Part-D was effective at staving that off,

No it wasn't, it was a stepping stone.

and then to hear Bush himself put it back on the table was disheartening.

Only if you expected a different path.

17 posted on 05/15/2006 11:09:43 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Daus

Thanks!

I believe this program will be a success, despite all the negative commentary from the liberal press. The trouble is that with the liberal machine constantly hammering seniors with the propaganda that George Bush and the Republicans are not their friends, I doubt this will translate into seniors voting Republican. Republicans will need to do a better job of reminding seniors (and the voters in general) of the good that has come from this administration, since voters will not get that information from the liberal press.


18 posted on 05/15/2006 11:13:19 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
I hope not. What would you be in favor of, if anything?

The entire problem with the prescription drug business is the concept of 'rebates' and price controls. Large insurers or Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) negotiate 'rebates' (there are various other words for this type of arrangement, let your imagination run) and the government has the benefit of both Rebates (to the states) and 'Best Price' to the feds.

The rebates do nothing but pad the wallets of the PBMs and float the state agencies. This, in combination, with the price controls caused the 'cash' prices for drugs to be inflated. Previously, Medicare receiptients were the predominant cash customer taking the hit for all of the above. This made for glorious, "Poor Aunt Edna has to buy drugs from Canada" media stories to bash the GOP. Part-D got them in under the third party payor umbrella and they all now enjoy the benefit of the rebates.

So, given that short lecture, a vast majority of the problem would have been addressed by pushing off the medicare receipients into competitive third party coverage, but there was no real need for the government to pick up as much benefit as they did. Market rate insurance coverage, with some guaruntee of coverability would have been fine. But would have had a hard time getting past the Dems would wanted to give it all away.
19 posted on 05/15/2006 11:20:43 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
I believe this program will be a success, despite all the negative commentary from the liberal press.

Sucess at what?

20 posted on 05/15/2006 11:22:31 AM PDT by Protagoras ("Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious".... George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson