1 posted on
05/15/2006 11:54:31 AM PDT by
Abathar
To: Abathar
De Facto becomes De Jure.
To: Abathar
This is quite the twist. Atleast she saw the light and raised her daughter in a normal household.
To: Abathar
The cat is out of the bag. What a mess this will be. I hope the homosexuals are happy now. Too bad the children will be the ones who suffer.
5 posted on
05/15/2006 11:58:52 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: Abathar
I wonder if Alito and Roberts voted to pass on this case? I don't think both of them are moderates.
12 posted on
05/15/2006 12:13:33 PM PDT by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: Abathar
Britain and Carvin split. Britain married the sperm donor This is the part of the story that will drive the liberals nuts. One of the lesbians went straight.
15 posted on
05/15/2006 12:25:10 PM PDT by
aimhigh
To: Abathar
I see the S.C. has the same testicles as the Republican leadership ... NONE!
22 posted on
05/15/2006 12:46:50 PM PDT by
moonman
(`)
To: Abathar
The Supreme Court doesn't have jurisdiction to hear domestic relations cases unless the case also raises a tort or contract claim or, of course, unless it involves a Constitutional right (which is how the Court justified hearing Griswold, Loving, Eisenstadt, and even Roe).
I am against gay adoptions or gay "parenting" but - atleast at this time - this wasn't a case the Court should have granted cert. We don't want activist judges either, right?
26 posted on
05/15/2006 12:51:41 PM PDT by
RebekahT
("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: Abathar
Britain married the sperm donor and barred Carvin from seeing the girl
words escape me.
The possibilities are endless...and the gays really can't like this case at all.
1. "Born gay " or a "lifestyle choice"?
2. Biological father have any rights? More than "de facto"?
3. "De Facto" have to pay child support?
4. Biological father have to pay support in case of divorce ?
30 posted on
05/15/2006 1:01:51 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't)
To: Abathar
Carvin and Britain lived together for 12 years. Britain was artificially inseminated and gave birth in 1995. They raised the daughter together for six years. Carvin stayed home, and the girl called her "Mama." The girl called Britain "Mommy." . . . The girl's biological mother, Page Britain, said that could "pave the way for children to have an unlimited and ever-changing number of parents." Only if you cohabit with an unlimited and ever-changing number of people, for multi-year stretches, while encouraging your child to call them "Mama" or "Papa". The rest of us are unaffected by this ruling.
To: Abathar; AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!
If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!
To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.
Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
A legitimate claim to parental rights?
It depends upon what the new fangled State judicial definition of parent will be ruled to be -it takes a village -don't ya know...
Washington State created the delusionally premised mess by ignoring and setting aside conventional wisdom and common law as to what many of the archaic once procreatively premised terms such as parent were uinderstood to be...
In this case the State courts do not reflect social morality -they attempt to create and impose their own version of morality upon society...
Supreme Court SEZ -they made the mess, let them deal with it. LOL
41 posted on
05/15/2006 7:31:16 PM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson