Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tennmountainman

we can have security fences, patrols, border agents interdicting them, surveillance, and a range of other things - without these measures.

c'mon, let's get real here.

and let me also add - right now, most americans are in favor of border security. but allow the media to run a few months of "rodney king" style videos of people being gunned down at the border, or caught in an electrified fence, or a moat of boiling oil - and US public opinion will turn. do you want that?


58 posted on 05/17/2006 1:29:40 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
c'mon, let's get real here

Amen. I'm sick of the DU-like comments. The only way to win this is via realistic means. This other crap is truly counterproductive.

Oceanview:

What do you think the odds are of a full-length fence?
Also, the Senate has a provision to disqualify those who've committed felonies from citizenship. Is that limited to those already convicted or will it extend to those convicted prior to applying for citizenship?
IOW, a lot of illegals have committed ID theft, used false SSNs etc, and destroyed people's (including children) credit. Will they lose the citizenship opportunity?

Personally, I'm opposed to the amnesty/citizenship stuff. I'm related and am friends with folks who've come here legally etc. Giving illegals citizenship within a few years it just junk when others have literally waited and toiled for decades.

73 posted on 05/17/2006 1:41:39 PM PDT by batter ("Never let the enemy pick the battle site." - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson