Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush agrees to full NSA oversight by Congress
Daily Times Pakistan ^ | 5/18/06 | Reuters

Posted on 05/17/2006 7:06:00 PM PDT by voletti

WASHINGTON: The White House, in an abrupt reversal, will allow the full Senate and House of Representatives intelligence committees to review President George W. Bush’s domestic spying programme, congressional officials said on Tuesday.

Two days before the programme was expected to dominate Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden’s Senate confirmation hearing as CIA director, the Republican chairmen of the Senate and House panels said separately that Bush had agreed to allow full committee oversight of his Terrorist Surveillance Programme.

The programme, which allows the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on the international phone calls and e-mails of US citizens without first obtaining warrants, has stirred an outcry in Congress among lawmakers who believe Bush may have overstepped his constitutional authority.

Up to now, the White House has sought to avoid full committee oversight by limiting briefings to subcommittees from each panel. Initially, the administration shared programme details only with the chairmen and vice chairmen of the committees and party leaders in the House and Senate.

“It became apparent that in order to have a fully informed confirmation hearing, all members of my committee needed to know the full width and breadth of the president’s programme,” Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, who heads the 15-member Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement. The first full Senate committee briefing was scheduled for Wednesday afternoon.

Hayden, who was the programme’s architect as NSA director from 1999 to 2005, was expected to face a blizzard of questions on NSA spying at a Thursday Senate confirmation hearing. Republican and Democratic senators have said his confirmation would depend on how detailed his answers would be.

A congressional aide who deals with intelligence matters said the change in policy on NSA oversight would also allow Hayden to speak about the programme during the classified segment of his confirmation hearing before Roberts’ committee. Reuters


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; homelandsecurity; michaelhayden; nsa; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2006 7:06:01 PM PDT by voletti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: voletti

give oversight to democrats in an election year, this is going to get uglier


2 posted on 05/17/2006 7:07:24 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Maybe the administration is looking to see who the leakers are on the Hill. Or maybe the whole story was bogus to smoke out who at NSA is leaking and to which members of the press?


3 posted on 05/17/2006 7:10:44 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

I suspect they floated a red herring...to see who would leak it....and snare the leaker and his reporter buddy.


4 posted on 05/17/2006 7:14:28 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: voletti

There goes the NSA. Leakers in Congress will have a great time putting more American lives in danger for the sake of politics. So much for connecting the dots.


5 posted on 05/17/2006 7:14:33 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
No...those who will be briefed.....will be the only ones to know the full details....so if it turns up in the NY Times or Compost...they will know who leaked it.

I have a feeling a trap is being laid.

6 posted on 05/17/2006 7:17:13 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
You think Rockefeller can resist spilling this to a reporter...I don't.

Going to be an interesting summer.

7 posted on 05/17/2006 7:19:24 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Well, if that is true. I hope they bring them both up on charges. I don't want a "deep throat" I want some trials. We are at war here.


8 posted on 05/17/2006 7:19:40 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
Brian Ross and ABC are worried tonight over the NSA story....and now with the phone companies claiming they didn't give the NSA any numbers....the plot thickens... add this to the mix.

Someone's butt is going to get snared....with all this clandestine stuff.

9 posted on 05/17/2006 7:23:28 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caisson71
Leakers in Congress will have a great time putting more American lives in danger for the sake of politics.

It makes no sense for President Bush to agree to this.

10 posted on 05/17/2006 7:23:34 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog
You think Rockefeller can resist spilling this to a reporter...I don't.

Dog, do we know if Rockefeller was even there. He has been notably absent from DC, ostensibly because of a serious back operaion which his website says allows him to work "from home" but not to be in the Capitol. I've been keeping my eye out for our own Mullah Omar.

11 posted on 05/17/2006 7:26:07 PM PDT by Bahbah (“KERRY LIED!! SCHOLARLY ATTRIBUTION DIED!!!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Korea, NSA, hmm...is there any other current big issue wants off the front pages??


12 posted on 05/17/2006 7:27:51 PM PDT by Shermy (Read my lips. No new amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

He is the ranking member of the Senate Intel Com....he was briefed...count on it.


13 posted on 05/17/2006 7:28:54 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog

I have a feeling a trap is being laid.



I believe you are correct....Bush doesn't trust them as far as he can throw them...


14 posted on 05/17/2006 7:30:37 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Just mail it on over to Bin Laden and save Al Quaeda some time.


15 posted on 05/17/2006 7:31:49 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
A congressional aide who deals with intelligence matters said the change in policy on NSA oversight would also allow Hayden to speak about the programme during the classified segment of his confirmation hearing before Roberts’ committee.

Maybe the Republicans are learning.

Polls aren't showing much support for the President or Congress for that matter, but they do show widespread support for intelligence gathering in the war on terror.

Think they can resist leaking classified information about the program?

Start providing less critical information in the closed session, and see how long it takes for the Dems to prove that they can't be trusted with such information.

Limit the scope of the briefings due to the leaks, and let the Dems pay the price for their doing what they do best.

16 posted on 05/17/2006 7:35:04 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: voletti

With all due respect Mr. President, this is really dumb. By the time the dems in congress get thru, they'll be accusing of everything under the sun.


17 posted on 05/17/2006 7:35:20 PM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR & 24, way too much butt time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
dems used to say it's all about the economy stupid. some people actually looked so they stopped saying it
18 posted on 05/17/2006 7:36:48 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

i hope your right


19 posted on 05/17/2006 7:37:34 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
A congressional aide who deals with intelligence matters said the change in policy on NSA oversight would also allow Hayden to speak about the programme during the classified segment of his confirmation hearing before Roberts’ committee.

Maybe the Republicans are learning.

Polls aren't showing much support for the President or Congress for that matter, but they do show widespread support for intelligence gathering in the war on terror.

Think they can resist leaking classified information about the program?

Start providing less critical information in the closed session, and see how long it takes for the Dems to prove that they can't be trusted with such information.

Limit the scope of the briefings due to the leaks, and let the Dems pay the price for their doing what they do best.

Of course that would require the Republicans to actually try and hold the Dems accountable for their treasonous acts.

Maybe they should stick with stonewalling on requests for oversight.

20 posted on 05/17/2006 7:38:16 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson