Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 05/18/2006 11:46:58 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/18/2006 11:47:37 PM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

3 posted on 05/18/2006 11:49:42 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

ROTFLMAO! As if no one saw this coming!


5 posted on 05/18/2006 11:50:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Personally I find it rather silly that gays getting divorced is taken to signify anything more or less than straights getting divorced.


6 posted on 05/18/2006 11:53:35 PM PDT by AntiGuv (How is Mexico our friend?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

the wages of sluttishness is quick separation....


8 posted on 05/19/2006 12:30:15 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
I think it is obvious that they were unable to consumate their so-called marriage.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

9 posted on 05/19/2006 12:32:45 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

This story is making my hot.


10 posted on 05/19/2006 12:35:45 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
But the relationship soured after Miss Ligthard accused Miss King of seeing another woman who had been a guest at their "wedding". The couple are now splitting up and face the prospect of dividing their joint assets.

Sounds like a Soap Opera

15 posted on 05/19/2006 2:43:56 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

I see a dildo custody battle on the horizon.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 3:08:33 AM PDT by sargunner (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

If you don't know any straight people who have divorced after only a few months of marriage, come to the States and I'll introduce you to my sister. She did it twice -- first marriage lasted seven weeks and the second marriage lasted five months.

19 posted on 05/19/2006 3:14:09 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
"She said she noticed something was wrong after Miss King, an amateur triathlete who works in insurance, began spending a lot of time away from home and kept bringing another woman back to the house."

This one is not going to be sending any rockets into space.

Is this known in England as "being called on the carpet"?

20 posted on 05/19/2006 3:46:12 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

"I asked her why she had gone through the wedding and she said it was to make me happy"

What a great reason to get married!!!!

Just shows that lesbians are just as stupid as non lesbians.


22 posted on 05/19/2006 3:51:17 AM PDT by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

So...who gets custody of the rug?

23 posted on 05/19/2006 3:53:24 AM PDT by Fintan (I thought I wasted bandwidth...then "The DaVinci Code" was released.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

I guess this just proves the old adage, "The carpet is always greener on the other side."


28 posted on 05/19/2006 4:10:35 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

Unfortunately, this is just the sort of scenario that will draw HUGE lobbying in favor of legitimizing. Can you just see the lawyers drooling over the boom in the divorce industry? We can say what we want, but this movement has powerful allies and we can't underestimate their ability to have gay marriage "rammed through" as law.

29 posted on 05/19/2006 4:10:39 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Miss Ligthard said that the break-up came after Miss King said she no longer loved her.

Sounds like Miss Ligthard "has had the rug pulled out from under her".

30 posted on 05/19/2006 4:23:16 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Marriage is only between a man and a woman for the purpose of bearing children. Anything else is a mock marriage. According to vermin this is not so; they open the door for "marriage" between a woman and her son, a man and his dog, a woman and her men, and so on, by that illogical rationale.

So now we have a mock divorce?


33 posted on 05/19/2006 4:39:55 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Moreover, in contrast to marriage, adultery was not recognised as grounds for ending a civil partnership, though unreasonable behaviour could be cited.

Adultery doesn't count as "Unreasonable behavior"? Would something like excessive channel surfing constitute "unreasonable behavior"? How about mixing plaids and stripes?

36 posted on 05/19/2006 4:59:47 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

What good is a story on lesbian tri-atheletes without pictures?


41 posted on 05/19/2006 5:54:51 AM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Gay marriages are a potential gold mine for lawyers. They'll have all those new legal definitions and findings to test.

Never mind the awful fallout and lives destroyed in the process, plenty of them will have many billable hours and lots of new $$$ available to them.

Ba$tard$ all!

Pinz


42 posted on 05/19/2006 6:01:13 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez (Charter Snowflake, Rummy fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson