Just a lousy photographer - probably the best he could do. What was his name?
Same as lousy reporters that can get nothing correct.
Come on now, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt. They're collapsing so fast maybe it was a cost cutting measure. After all, for the really GOOD, respectable, well-posed picture of Bush, that silly photographer wanted a whole $3!
Maybe the AP settled on this one for a whole 10 cents. You know, giving them the benefit of the doubt as a cost cutting measure that is!