Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's a pdf interview with the inventor.
1 posted on 05/21/2006 3:35:18 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: ovrtaxt


I'm all for it.


2 posted on 05/21/2006 3:36:31 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

ping for later read


3 posted on 05/21/2006 3:38:10 PM PDT by crghill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

People should treat these claims as scams until proven otherwise.


4 posted on 05/21/2006 3:38:27 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
"By replacing an 800 pound V-8 engine with a 25 pound MYT and running it on biodiesel, we can achieve 150 miles per gallon in an otherwise conventional vehicle -- plus, you're going to have better take-off and stopping power by removing that 800 pound engine. That's what we can do. It is achievable." - Raphial Morgado

Then do it, and then get back to us.

5 posted on 05/21/2006 3:39:46 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
Imagine dumping the big V-8 in your SUV for a 25-pound, 2.4 liter engine that gives you 150 miles per gallon on biodiesel - with a boost in horsepower and torque to boot.

Imagine losing your nest egg in a scam.

7 posted on 05/21/2006 3:42:03 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
Is this like the 200 mpg carburetor that can't be used because it explodes?
8 posted on 05/21/2006 3:42:05 PM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

AND THE ME DESIGN IS NOT A ROTARY OR WANKEL?


9 posted on 05/21/2006 3:42:45 PM PDT by street_lawyer (Conservative Defender of the Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

I wish him luck.


13 posted on 05/21/2006 3:44:41 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

American Antigravity? Yep. I believe anything they say on THAT website.


14 posted on 05/21/2006 3:45:33 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
850 cubic inches of displacement, 32-pulses per cycle, and a 150 pound package measuring only 14" by 14" in diameter.

Man, talk about a win-win-win scenario...
I can throw one of these puppies in my Prius, reduce total weight by 200 pounds, increase mileage threefold and have 7-second quarter miles...

I may have to get two.
Are they all personally signed by the tooth fairy?

15 posted on 05/21/2006 3:46:20 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

If true, and he patented it he will be one rich dude.


16 posted on 05/21/2006 3:46:51 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
Sounds fantastic. Maybe too much so.
20 posted on 05/21/2006 3:49:45 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"The inspiration for the MYT Engine design came from the need to have an engine that can stand up to the tremendous abuse of drag racing."

As a younger man I had a passing interest in drag racing when their speeds for the 1/4 mile run was in the 200-225mph range. Since then that interest had disappeared.

Last night, on the radio, I heard two qualifers ran at speeds of 330+mph! Whaaaat??

Can someone tell me what's changed in the past 25 years? Thanks.

23 posted on 05/21/2006 3:50:53 PM PDT by rvoitier ("News is what's suppressed. Everything else is advertising.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

I'll belive it when I see it.


24 posted on 05/21/2006 3:52:23 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
I watched the videos. I'm not sure what they're supposed to prove, except that if someone steps in front of a camera, you can't see anything.
25 posted on 05/21/2006 3:53:08 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
inventor Raphial Morgado

I'm immediately suspicious of a person whose title has to be defaulted to "inventor" because they don't have any other credentials.

26 posted on 05/21/2006 3:54:15 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

Dang, that looks good!


31 posted on 05/21/2006 4:01:00 PM PDT by Chieftain (Cindy Sheehan is a shameful example of an American mother duped by Kerry's LIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

I am a gearhead for sure, but I hope we have a few comments from those that are really technically competent. Looks interesting, but I will wait to see it in a few dozen cars under constant use for a few weeks.


33 posted on 05/21/2006 4:05:15 PM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt
...a displacement of 850 cubic inches ...

Tell me that's a typo.

A TINY engine with a displacement of 850 CUBIC INCHES?!!!

34 posted on 05/21/2006 4:07:26 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

I looked at the video clips. They leave a lot out. However, if you look at the very first few seconds of the "testing" video, there is a moving cutaway model.

That explains how they implemented the concepts in the
"how it works" clip.

It appears that the "pistons" are a series of "pucks" that are affixed to two separately rotating rings. The combustion chamber is donut-shaped and the pucks roate through the outside ring of the donut. The resulting power shaft goes through the "hole" of the donut. The inside part of the chamber is split in two. Half the pistons are attached at the front half and half are attached at the back. The two assemblies take turns accelerating as the pistons go around the combustion chamber.

It appears there is some mechanism to smoothe out the motion into a continuous rotation, it also likely regulates the movement of the two piston assemblies.

I was a little skeptical, but I have to admit that this engine might actually work. It may not deliver what he promises, but standard piston engines are woefully inefficient. The way this works appears to eliminate a lot of the wasted motion (and thus power).

Couple areas of concern - not sure how you would seal the combustion chamber when there are three pieces rotating against each other - I suppose it could be done with rings like pistons have.

Secondly, machining that donut combustion chamber looks complicated. Not undoable, just not something the average engine machine shop is going to be able to do easily.

Running biodiesel would likely be good for lubricating all the piston assemblies. I don't see any way to lubricate any of that without injecting oil into the combustion chamber.

Interesting. I sure wish the guy well. It certainly looks like there is some serious engineering involved in it.


35 posted on 05/21/2006 4:08:41 PM PDT by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson