Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay foster parents abused young boys (UK)
Telegraph UK ^ | May 23, 2006 | Nigel Bunyan

Posted on 05/23/2006 12:29:28 PM PDT by DBeers

Gay foster parents abused young boys

A council was condemned yesterday for failing to prevent a paedophile homosexual couple from abusing young boys even after being alerted by one of the victim's parents.

Foster parents Ian Wathey, 40, and Craig Faunch, 32, face long terms in jail after being convicted of molesting and filming eight-year-old twins and two boys aged 14.

The twins were video-taped as they showered together, while one of the older boys was sexually abused by Wathey in his bedroom.

Both men "hurt" him, he told Leeds Crown Court. "I do not like them any more. I want them to go to prison."

Yesterday it emerged that Wakefield council had been warned of possible abuse by the twins' mother, Mrs X.

She had found bathroom photographs of her sons but an inquiry by social workers cleared the paedophiles of wrongdoing and said they had simply been "naive and silly". Police were not called in. Wathey and Faunch had moved on to abusing the two 14-year-olds by the time police arrested them in Pontefract, West Yorks.

The two men began abusing boys within a month of Wakefield social services approving them as foster carers in July 2003.

Outside the court, Mrs X said: "I thought the council would have contacted the police as part of the investigation. . . Maybe if something had been done sooner we would not be here today."

Kitty Ferris, for the council, said applications by the men to become foster carers had been approved "in accordance with statutory requirements and council policy".

She added: "Although correct procedures were carried out at every stage the service has reviewed its internal procedures to identify what lessons should be learned."

Both men were told they faced substantial jail terms and sentencing was adjourned.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 4gayagenda; 4perversion; 4recruitment; adoption; fostercare; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexualpredator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
a paedophile homosexual couple

? ? ?

Tragic and completely preventable considering what WAS known.

Considering what IS known now -would that make the disorder factor to be considered prior to placing children as regards to this "loving couple" one of disordered times two or disordered squared?

1 posted on 05/23/2006 12:29:32 PM PDT by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Reason #1 why homos, sodomites and lesbos should never, never be allowed with 100ft of a child.


2 posted on 05/23/2006 12:31:17 PM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Gay foster parents abused young boys

The story says it all...

3 posted on 05/23/2006 12:31:47 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Does this shock anyone?

Of course, you won't see the MSM in the States pick up such a story.


4 posted on 05/23/2006 12:33:48 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Imagine that! Who would have thought something like this could ever happen? Gay men molesting young boys--inconcievable!

[/sarcasm]


5 posted on 05/23/2006 12:33:55 PM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

This ought to go a long way in the agenda of "Gay Adoption" ............


6 posted on 05/23/2006 12:34:21 PM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
She added: "Although correct procedures were carried out at every stage the service has reviewed its internal procedures to identify what lessons should be learned."

Tragically, the lesson they won't learn is that children should not be placed under the care of those who define their identities solely by their sexual proclivities. So, more children will be sacrificed on the altar of Political Correctness.

7 posted on 05/23/2006 12:35:31 PM PDT by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

My question about the story is, WHY Mrs. X's twin boys were in FOSTER CARE, instead of with her?


8 posted on 05/23/2006 12:35:39 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Of course, you won't see the MSM in the States pick up such a story.

That's because such stories don't really happen. Gay pedophiles actually make excellent foster and adoptive parents, much better than heterosexual people, especially married ones. (Didn't you go to public school???)

9 posted on 05/23/2006 12:46:18 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Alas, yes. Now that family law is becoming strictly gender neutral any agency that refuses to place a child with a gay couple for any reason (short of a police record, perhaps) risks a ruinous lawsuit for discrimination. Most agencies cannot afford even one such suit, regardless of whether they win or lose.


10 posted on 05/23/2006 12:51:19 PM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Probably because Mrs. X could not give her children all the cultural advantages which the gay couple could give her children.

The people who gave those men children were counting on this happening. Nothing will happen to the "social scientists " who gave those men children ,and the "social scientists " will do all they can to make sure this happens again.
11 posted on 05/23/2006 12:53:13 PM PDT by after dark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
paedophile homosexual couple

Pederasty is different from pedophilia.

12 posted on 05/23/2006 1:01:25 PM PDT by A. Pole (Second hand smoking is a major cause of global warming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
My question about the story is, WHY Mrs. X's twin boys were in FOSTER CARE, instead of with her?

I am not sure why specifically the government (in the best interests of the children) removed them from their mother or placed them with a two heterosexual males that supposedly wanted children BUT to a lesser degree than they wanted the procreative dead end of homosexual sex...

I found a couple more links to articles on this story and will post them on this thread shortly...

13 posted on 05/23/2006 1:08:47 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joylyn

Ah, the glory of forced egalitarian socialism.


14 posted on 05/23/2006 1:15:45 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
-more articles on the story...

I told social services about nude photo ... why weren't they stopped?

EXCERPT:
Victim's mum reveals how she warned local authority about foster perverts 8 months before another boy went to police. Reports by GEOFF FOX and MARK LAVERY

THE MOTHER of twins who were filmed naked by gay foster pervert Craig Faunch has spoken of her disbelief at the failings of Wakefield Council's social services department.

Why Were They Cleared To Prey On Kids?

EXCERPT:
MP demands inquiry over gay foster dads as mum of victim says she'll sue

By Geoff Fox and Mark Lavery

CALLS for a full inquiry into how a gay couple were allowed to abuse vulnerable boys in foster care are growing today.

And the mother of a 14-year-old autistic boy abused by Ian Wathey and Craig Faunch says she intends to sue Wakefield Council for failing her son.

Hemsworth MP Jon Trickett has joined calls for an investigation into the council's social services department.

"Something has clearly gone wrong," Mr Trickett said today. "There must be a full inquiry. Steps must be taken to put things right in the department. Never again should a child from Wakefield district have to face a repeat of these circumstances."


15 posted on 05/23/2006 1:16:02 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Not possible. Everyone knows that homosexuals are only sexually interested in adults. /sarc


16 posted on 05/23/2006 1:18:02 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ginty for US Senate in NJ -- Primary day is June 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

You're a homophobe for even posting this.

Not to mention being a right-wing, discriminatory pedophilophobe.

Hatemongering and hate speech of this kind has no place in public discourse. Maybe we can get a judge to issue an injunction prohibiting you from posting these kinds of articles.


17 posted on 05/23/2006 1:31:47 PM PDT by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joylyn
Alas, yes. Now that family law is becoming strictly gender neutral any agency that refuses to place a child with a gay couple for any reason (short of a police record, perhaps) risks a ruinous lawsuit for discrimination. Most agencies cannot afford even one such suit, regardless of whether they win or lose.

YUP -a real nightmarish scenario.

Government Village ideology versus Individual Human Rights (something already taken away from the aborted)

It takes a moral relative village to provide delusionally premised rights for the disordered at the expense of what should be unalienable rights for the most innocent -the potentially aborted and the potentially homosexualized...

Anyway, I guess to the heartless government agencies (sociological parents) when it comes to money versus children -money wins is the rule; conversely, I would venture to claim the opposite regarding any actual parents...

18 posted on 05/23/2006 1:34:10 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
Maybe we can get a judge to issue an injunction prohibiting you from posting these kinds of articles.

I, for one, am profoundly offended. (Can I file suit now, or do I have to wait???)

19 posted on 05/23/2006 1:35:51 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
People need to wake up. The " social scientists " would never let those types gain custody of their children. This is another blatant attempt to destroy the competition.
20 posted on 05/23/2006 1:38:08 PM PDT by after dark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson