Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US keeps pushing Norway to buy Joint Strike Fighter jets
www.aftenposten.no ^ | 23 May 2006, 16:28 | Aftenposten's reporter Morten Fyhn - Aftenposten English Web Desk Nina Berglund

Posted on 05/23/2006 12:31:53 PM PDT by Kurt_Hectic

US President George W Bush's new man in Oslo applied some not-so-subtle pressure on Norway to buy US Joint Strike Fighter jets this week, saying a failure to do so would weaken military operations between the countries. Not true, responded a top Norwegian military official.

"No matter what type of fighter jet we decide to buy, it will be NATO-compatible," Espen Barth Eide of the Defense Ministry told newspaper Aftenposten on Tuesday.

Barth Eide was responding to remarks made by US Ambassador Benson K Whitney during a speech Monday before The Norwegian Atlantic Committee, an independent organization that aims to increase understanding of Norwegian foreign, military and security policy.

In otherwise general remarks aimed at nurturing relations between the US and Norway, Whitney made it clear that he and his president want Norway to commit to buying Joint Strike Fighters from Lockheed Martin. The F-35 JSF jets would be produced at Lockheed Martin's Fort Worth division in Texas, Bush's home state.

The JSF program aims to build three versions of the same single-engine stealth fighter plane for the US and eight allied nations. It represents a huge investment and billions of dollars are at stake, making it critical for the US defense industry that foreign partners play along.

"Norway's continued participation in the Joint Strike Fighter program would maximize our continued ability to work together globally," said Whitney in prepared remarks. " I hope that going forward with this decision will be seen as not just an economic issue, but also one of critical strategic importance." He maintained that the US and Norway must use the same technological platform to ensure that they can mount military operations together.

Political observers listening to his speech had no doubts that the US will evaluate Norway's final decision on the jet fighters as an indication of how closely Norway wants to cooperate with the US.

Asked whether the lack of a Norwegian commitment to the JSF program would damage relations between the two countries, Whitney avoided answering directly. "My point is that our ability to operate together will be weakened," he told Aftenposten, if Norway buys its jet fighters from a producer outside the US.

'Just doing his job' Barth Eide of the Norwegian Defense Industry said he was neither surprised nor angry that the US ambassador was doing his job by trying to sell the American fighter jets. Barth Eide noted, however, that NATO's fleet of jets already is varied and not dependent on jets of the same make.

Norwegian officials have also complained earlier that Norwegian sub-contractors have been snaring few contracts for work on the JSF program. Norway also has other jet fighter options, not least the rival Eurofighter program.

The Dallas Morning News reported earlier this month that Barth Eide had sent an e-mail to the Pentagon procurement chief Kenneth Krieg, informing him that "the Norwegian government (had)... decided to continue its participation" in developing the JSF F-35 jet. Barth Eide added, however, that the decision "is not a commitment to purchasing the JSF, and we will continue our dialogue also with the other potential suppliers."

Barth Eide told Aftenposten on Tuesday that Norway will prioritize its operational needs, the price of the jets and the quality, along with the opportunities Norwegian industry stand to get from the program.

"If we end up buying fighter jets other than the JSF, it doesn't mean we're turning our back on the US," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: defenseindustry; embassy; jsf; nato; norway; whitney
The fighter purchase should be based on operational requirements only, but I doubt that the other competitors; the sweedish JAS Grippen and the Eurofighter has the same technological future as the JSF.
1 posted on 05/23/2006 12:31:57 PM PDT by Kurt_Hectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic


And you would be correct...but I am sure "Pukin Dog" will be on this thread to tell you otherwise and then how right he is...


2 posted on 05/23/2006 12:33:20 PM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic

Why do we want to sell the latest technology to a future Muslim nation?........


3 posted on 05/23/2006 12:42:51 PM PDT by Red Badger (Liberals ignore criminal behavior, reward sloth and revere incompetence...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic
Statement 1:
" I hope that going forward with this decision will be seen as not just an economic issue, but also one of critical strategic importance."

Statement 2:
Barth Eide told Aftenposten on Tuesday that Norway will prioritize its operational needs, the price of the jets and the quality, along with the opportunities Norwegian industry stand to get from the program.

A lot more economic issue in statement 2 than was mentioned in statement 1.
4 posted on 05/23/2006 12:42:56 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic

The others simply lost, now they cry that it's only because of politics or blame their failure on anything except the fact that the platform competing with the JSF is less capable, more expensive (In the EF case), harder to logistically sustain and and and. JSF will be the next F16. Everyone knows it. What you have now is sour grapes by those who lost.


5 posted on 05/23/2006 1:23:46 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_Hectic

The F-35 was on display at Andrews AFB open house last weekend. It's designed to be very cost-efficient, with standardized components. I think there's 9 countries who are going to be using it, at least so far.


6 posted on 05/23/2006 1:24:01 PM PDT by Sisku Hanne (Equal treatment for illegal aliens: the US should adopt Mexico's immigration policy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The moos won't eat a tasty BLT, but they will chow down on lutefisk?
Uff da!


7 posted on 05/23/2006 2:03:03 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Why do we want to sell the latest technology to a future Muslim nation?........

Money. Benson K Whitney sees his future as lobbying for L:ockeheed Martin

8 posted on 05/23/2006 4:19:11 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Here to Help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson