Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

...a different story from what Reuters published.
1 posted on 05/24/2006 1:56:21 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: familyop

They won't be around that long : )


2 posted on 05/24/2006 2:06:20 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
--- Greater US involvement in the region, at the invitation of Gulf Arab states, could create a debate within the Iranian regime as to whether its security interests were served by continuing to ignore international concern, the report suggests. ---

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!! So now they NEED the good ol' USofA! Spit on us, call us Nazis, and call us morons, but nowwwwwwwwwwwwww they need us. How adorable!

Tell the world we're buzy!

3 posted on 05/24/2006 2:11:02 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

That report is nonsense! It's only four or five simple steps to enrichment at 90% purity. How the hell does IISS know the stage of processing of which Iran is enduring? We couldn't even get a proper general assessment of where/what the WMD was in Iraq!

Iran can be ready with a nasty piece of work by this year based on what THEY have already admitted to having, centrifuge wise.


5 posted on 05/24/2006 2:53:16 PM PDT by LittleBillyInfidel ("Hello Mullah. Hello Fatwa. Little Billy. Not Sinatra." (Extreme Apologies to Mr. K and Mr. Sherman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Iran could have a nuke next month...No wait
Iran could have a nuke in 1 years...No wait
Iran could have a nuke in 3 years...No wait
Iran could have a nuke in 5 years...No wait
Iran could have a nuke in 10 years...No wait
Iran could have a nuke in 4 years...No wait
Iran could already have a nuke...

This garbage is getting old.

Nothing like pulling a number from out of a hat.


6 posted on 05/24/2006 3:07:21 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
In the judgement of the IISS there is a growing consensus that an Iranian nuclear capacity is 'both almost inevitable, and certainly bad.'

Gee, you think?

7 posted on 05/24/2006 3:29:29 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (Hating Bush does not count as a strategy for defeating Islamic terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

...related.

Who pays when U.S. pulls out?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1637773/posts


8 posted on 05/24/2006 4:35:23 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Iran could be able to produce between 20 and 25 kilos of highly-enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon by 2010

And what if someone gives them some?

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

9 posted on 05/24/2006 5:13:53 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
A even different story if some gives them the enriched uranium.

Im of the opinion someone already has.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

10 posted on 05/24/2006 5:16:49 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
"Strategy" of containment? What strategy? And what containment? Everybody with two nickels to rub together will have nuclear weapons by 2015.
11 posted on 05/24/2006 5:31:03 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson