Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinna
It really makes no sense, most of her comments lately make no sense.

It makes sense to her constituents in New York City, where you can't legally drive more than 50 on the highways and parkways within the city, and need to drive way out of town in order to legally drive more than 55. Many New Yorkers have a myopic world view - if we can't drive fast because of traffic, it must mean that no one else is able to drive fast in the rest of the country.

Never mind that the local speed limits are already set artificially low in order to generate revenue for the state. Never mind that in a rational state like Texas, they are proposing to RAISE the speed limit in wide open West Texas to 80 because *gasp that's the speed people drive in the middle of nowhere *gasp* and it doesn't make sense to criminalize normal driving behavior.
50 posted on 05/24/2006 3:39:40 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc

It makes sense to her constituents in New York City, where you can't legally drive more than 50 on the highways and parkways within the city

Yeah, right, like that yellow cab I was in last month that hit at least 70 going down Broadway, then slammed on the brakes, then hit 70, then slammed on the brakes. G-r-e-a-t gas conservation by one of her beloved NY constituents.


111 posted on 05/24/2006 4:02:26 PM PDT by hardworking (Me? I just work to earn a living, pay taxes, educate my kids...so what could I possiblty know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

From one Conservative in NYC to another:
With the media of today, there is no local constituency. The speed limit in NYC is 35 mph- slower in some areas.

Someone like Hillary who flies around in private jets burning thousands of tons of fuel a year, and goes nowhere without her huge caravan of gas guzzling SUVs (armed of course) is the last person to tell other people to conserve.

If she wants to save fuel, she should do what most NYers do... walk everywhere. She might lose a few and slim down those piano stool legs of hers.

"We are going to take thing away from you for your own good" Hillary Rotten Clinton


192 posted on 05/24/2006 9:10:27 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

Well, I lived in west Texas during the "Carter 55mph" period. Everyone still drove 75 to 80mph and had their "ears on" wide open talking constantly with truckers and such. Actually, it was kinda fun and kept one alert for sure. Does anyone remember their handle from those days? I remember mine but ain't tell'n. Seriously though, these kind of remarks are great and I hope Ms Clinton continues making them. I have heard it said that she has a "lead ear" when it come to reading the wind in politics. I sure hope that's true!


206 posted on 05/25/2006 12:08:35 AM PDT by snoringbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
The limit in Montana was "Reasonable and prudent" Sunny day, good car, dry road, and no traffic, you decide.

Some nitwit in an exotic car decided that meant they could go 60-70 mph faster than the convoy of 'runamuckas' they were weaving through, and ended up suing the State when they got a ticket because the statute was (as they claimed and the court upheld) "unconstitutionally vague".

Now drivers there are limited to 75 on the interstates...You used to be able to do 120 and not get a ticket, if the road and the car were right.

213 posted on 05/25/2006 1:27:36 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

Cars get better gas mileage on the highway than in the city. In the city, a lot of gas is wasted sitting at intersections and signals.

Save gas by (a) banning stopping at intersections; or (b) driving in cities.

Should work.


250 posted on 05/25/2006 7:41:07 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (China & India: Doing jobs Americans don't want to do (manuf., engineering, accounting, etc))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
West Texas to 80 because *gasp that's the speed people drive in the middle of nowhere *gasp* and it doesn't make sense to criminalize normal driving behavior.

Sorry can't agree at all. Check out the stopping distances for pickups and SUV's at 80mph lately? I'm totally against raising the speed limits further, and while I know I'm virtually alone (even my wife, a Democrat thinks I'm nuts on this one) I'd welcome the return of the 55mph speed limit. 55 was plenty fast enough.

305 posted on 06/06/2006 3:45:04 PM PDT by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
Many New Yorkers have a myopic world view

New Yorker view of the USA.

325 posted on 07/25/2006 2:07:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
RAISE the speed limit in wide open West Texas to 80

Exactly. Why should it be assumed that 70 or 55 is the right speed limit anyway. We should be trying to push speeds higher as technology safely allows. I hope my great grandkids don't have to settle for sub-100MPH travel. Thank goodness we don't have to settle for horse and buggy speed today. I'm not saying make it 100MPH tomorrow, but there should be national leadership on the topic of building cars and roads that can handle faster and faster travel, and do it safer that today.

393 posted on 12/21/2006 3:43:57 PM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson