Posted on 05/25/2006 8:40:53 AM PDT by Caleb1411
Oh I believe you Allegra. No doubt there's still much in Iraq. And I have read several articles proving enough was found in Iraq to justify the U.S. invasion.
I also believe the Anthrax used in this country during the 9/11 attacks came from Iraq.
Why, oh why, will the Republican leadership not get this info out to the public?
Absolutely.
LOL!
That just shows how good a liar Bush is.
One question.
Assume all the statements about Saddam having WMDs at the time of the invasion are true. I believed he had them along with everybody else. Granted, he may have moved some out to Syria, and he may have buried some. But surely, he kept a bunch handy. Why? He saw war coming.
Weapons are to wage war. Offensive and/or defensive war. There's no other purpose for WMDs.
So how come, pushed to the wall, faced with overwhelming probability of his removal from power, if not his death and that of his family, did he not use them against our troops? That's question that troubles me to this day. I can't answer it, and the attempts I've heard so far (we invaded too quickly, he only used a few and we didn't notice, he moved them all out so that he could return to power later, etc.) don't stand out as good enough; the only reason he had them was to use them to stay in power and make trouble.
To me, all other arguments about whether the WMDs existed, how many, where, etc. are subordinate to this: How come Saddam didn't use his WMDs against the invasion, in an all-out effort to save his regime?
BTTT
Yep! Just a figment of your imagination!
Saddam's Christian general, what was his name? Sadr? He said that he saw the hollowed out passenger planes used to transport the weapons to Syria.
Saddam had WMD and was working on getting his nuke program running again. It's the truth. There is more evidence that he had them (attacks, witnesses) than that he didn't.
Thomas B. Cochran, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the low-enriched version could be useful to a nation with nuclear ambitions.
"A country like Iran," Cochran said, "could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium."
WMD did EXIST and he [Saddam] did NOT provide the PROOF MANDATED that they were destroyed......... hence they existed.
Rational thinking and reponsible persons could not believe otherwise.
I think most of them ended up in Iran and Syria.
http://cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap3.html
http://cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html
Some of them are still in Iraq.
"BUTCHER of BASRA" Admits to Iraq's Weapons Program in EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=286
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.