Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who thought Iraq had WMD? Most everybody
Townhall ^ | May 25, 2006 | Larry Elder

Posted on 05/25/2006 8:40:53 AM PDT by Caleb1411

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Allegra

Oh I believe you Allegra. No doubt there's still much in Iraq. And I have read several articles proving enough was found in Iraq to justify the U.S. invasion.

I also believe the Anthrax used in this country during the 9/11 attacks came from Iraq.

Why, oh why, will the Republican leadership not get this info out to the public?


41 posted on 05/25/2006 10:32:43 AM PDT by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Absolutely.


42 posted on 05/25/2006 10:46:46 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

LOL!


43 posted on 05/25/2006 10:55:38 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Even Saddam thought he had WMD's.

That just shows how good a liar Bush is.

44 posted on 05/25/2006 11:18:44 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411; girlangler; Allegra
> Any questions?

One question.

Assume all the statements about Saddam having WMDs at the time of the invasion are true. I believed he had them along with everybody else. Granted, he may have moved some out to Syria, and he may have buried some. But surely, he kept a bunch handy. Why? He saw war coming.

Weapons are to wage war. Offensive and/or defensive war. There's no other purpose for WMDs.

So how come, pushed to the wall, faced with overwhelming probability of his removal from power, if not his death and that of his family, did he not use them against our troops? That's question that troubles me to this day. I can't answer it, and the attempts I've heard so far (we invaded too quickly, he only used a few and we didn't notice, he moved them all out so that he could return to power later, etc.) don't stand out as good enough; the only reason he had them was to use them to stay in power and make trouble.

To me, all other arguments about whether the WMDs existed, how many, where, etc. are subordinate to this: How come Saddam didn't use his WMDs against the invasion, in an all-out effort to save his regime?

45 posted on 05/25/2006 12:18:08 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411

BTTT


46 posted on 05/25/2006 12:19:01 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Yep! Just a figment of your imagination!


47 posted on 05/25/2006 12:33:43 PM PDT by Bommer (Attention illegals: Why don't you do the jobs we can't do? Like fix your own countries problems!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411

Saddam's Christian general, what was his name? Sadr? He said that he saw the hollowed out passenger planes used to transport the weapons to Syria.

Saddam had WMD and was working on getting his nuke program running again. It's the truth. There is more evidence that he had them (attacks, witnesses) than that he didn't.


48 posted on 05/25/2006 12:37:52 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411
An airliner brimming with aviation fuel is a WMD in every sense - as we know all too well after the fact.

Our imaginations oftentimes have a tendency to lag and underestimate those of creative mass murderers.
49 posted on 05/25/2006 12:41:32 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
From the article you linked in post #37...

"The ISG also found a previously undeclared program to build a "high-speed rail gun," a device apparently designed for testing nuclear-weapons materials. That came in addition to 500 tons of natural uranium stockpiled at Iraq's main declared nuclear site south of Baghdad, which International Atomic Energy Agency spokesman Mark Gwozdecky acknowledged to Insight had been intended for "a clandestine nuclear-weapons program.""

The IAEA also refused to let the U.S. remove this 500 ton stockpile of Uranium last May. LINK

From my link...

"Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium, a more potent form but still not sufficient for a weapon.

Thomas B. Cochran, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the low-enriched version could be useful to a nation with nuclear ambitions.

"A country like Iran," Cochran said, "could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium."

50 posted on 05/25/2006 3:36:30 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
"One question."

Saddam had WMD's to use on Iran (which is documented) and his unarmed Kurds, (which is also documented). It was understood that if he used any unconventional weapons on U.S. forces, we would nuke him. Good question and I hope I've helped answer it for you.
51 posted on 05/25/2006 3:41:58 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411
Only in a post-Clinton world where Bullsh.t rules could the MSM convince 51% of the nation that BUSH LIED.

WMD did EXIST and he [Saddam] did NOT provide the PROOF MANDATED that they were destroyed......... hence they existed.

Rational thinking and reponsible persons could not believe otherwise.

52 posted on 05/25/2006 3:50:49 PM PDT by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

I think most of them ended up in Iran and Syria.


53 posted on 05/25/2006 4:00:21 PM PDT by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

http://cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap3.html

http://cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html


54 posted on 05/25/2006 8:39:28 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MistrX
I think most of them ended up in Iran and Syria.

Some of them are still in Iraq.

55 posted on 05/25/2006 9:54:59 PM PDT by Allegra (Finbar for Texas Governor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411

"BUTCHER of BASRA" Admits to Iraq's Weapons Program in EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=286


56 posted on 05/27/2006 7:11:09 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson