[kAcknor]

Both of mine are in the 'Anti-America' yes side.

One is up for reelection. Screw him. I'll not support a democrat, but I'll leave that race blank (significantly, for much the same reasons).

A good argument can be made of the consequences of losing, up to and including the loss of the Senate. What of it? If in the end, the results are the same, and the only difference is the timetable, or a matter of degree of outcome, really, so what?

--From Ohio

[Rakkasan1]

same here. In MN, it's hard to tell the republican'ts from the demonrats.

[Ole Okie]

All four of mine (senators from Oklahoma and Georgia) are in the NO column.

Thank you, Sen. Inhofe, Sen. Coburn, Sen. Isaakson, and Sen. Chambliss.

I have voted for three of these good men (not in the same election!). I couldn't vote for Sen. Coburn when I lived in Oklahoma because he was then running for representative and I wasn't in his district. But I was really pulling for him.

[Fudd Fan]

Losing the Senate (R) majority might not seem important to you, but trust me - you do NOT want Harry Reid in charge of the Senate if we have another SCOTUS nom before Presiden't Bush leaves office. For heaven's sake, IT MATTERS.