and this changes the fact that UN troops are stomping on people how?
If Slick Willie and the UN hadn't been involved in the first place, those people would have solved their problems on their own, either in war or in some other fashion.
I don't care who's land it was, it's who's land it is now.
I don't have any love for the UN whatsoever and would rather see the entire pisshole organization dumped into the East River.
Blue hats?
Kill 'em all.
You will care whose land Kosovo was when the UN steps in demanding that we hand Texas and California over to Vincente Fox on the same stupid premise of ethnicity being everything and things like rightful ownership and sovereignty not meaning anything any more.
Instead of stepping back, the UN didn't. The UN and police got hurt by the mob which wouldn't stop and so they got tear gassed.
Would you be happy if you or your children or your elderly parents were regularly stoned by people - even if they were women and children throwing those rocks?
What if your children were regularly stoned on their bus rides by a particular ethnic mob? Would you mind then if police fired tear gas back at the stone throwing mob?
The UN should have never been there --agreed -- but the UN is (as usual) DEFENDING the savages.
Check this out: http://www.acton.org/ppolicy/comment/article.php?article=325
You got point there, but UN isnt stomping Kosovo as land, but UN is stomping Serbian Christian land giving it to the muslims.
That is the fact.