Skip to comments.
Important Update on Veteran Data Theft
Military.com ^
| May 27, 2006
Posted on 05/27/2006 12:07:34 AM PDT by Eagle9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Eagle9
There's no update, but there is information on how we can try to assume responsibility for what our fed did to us through some civil service dingbat hired by the fed.
21
posted on
05/27/2006 12:09:26 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
Is there a possibility to sue for mis-appropiation of government data and the resulting loss thereof? The suit would have to be filed as a "jointly and severally" type suit to really be effective.
22
posted on
05/27/2006 12:17:23 PM PDT
by
NY Attitude
(You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
To: Eagle9
Well isn't this just wonderful. (not)
23
posted on
05/27/2006 12:27:09 PM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Lurker
First, God Bless you for your service to our country. Second, no worries on your directness. It was not overboard - I took it as someone having strong feelings on the issue. And a better perspective on it.
24
posted on
05/27/2006 4:45:23 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: JockoManning
25
posted on
05/27/2006 7:43:17 PM PDT
by
JockoManning
(Listen Online http://www.klove.com)
To: Eagle9
Bump for Veteran Identity Theft.
26
posted on
05/28/2006 11:59:16 PM PDT
by
Sundog
(cheers.)
To: Eagle9
27
posted on
05/29/2006 8:03:16 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: BJungNan
I mean, it only applies if they can get a credit card in your name. Right? no
They can establish a new "self" - you use your ID for a lot more than credit cards.
But in that vein, as one example, they could open up a debit card account, bank accounts, drivers license, car registration, etc - use those for ID for anything you use an ID for - and eventually, become "you" - which will cause you a whopping load of trouble...may even, down the line, start collecting social security. It takes lots of time and money and frustration to straighten out a stolen identity
28
posted on
05/29/2006 2:21:30 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: Lurker
careless government employee I'm a bit suspicious of this. There has to be a strict rule against taking any data home and every employee has to know it.
Couple that with the fact that he just as he takes it home -ooops - stolen.
I'd be looking to see his background, contacts, any unusual funds in his possession - etc
29
posted on
05/29/2006 2:28:12 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
To: maine-iac7
The real issue here is why in the first place is that sort of data available on a disk, an unsecure disk at that? It quite properly belongs on a secure server sited in a secure facility. Stored on Encrypted Drives requiring two part authentication to access. With few exceptions the records should only accessible on an individual basis (one at time) maybe by no more than 3-4 people at once without specific authorization and purpose approved by both the Senior System Administrator, System Security Officer and whom ever is their Chief Information Officer. There is no reasonable explanation why everyones data was sitting on one Disk in the first place.
This is almost as asinine$ as when it was revealed that Los Alamos kept some of our most sensitive data related to Nuclear Weapons research and production on the same servers they allowed general access to by nearly everyone at Los Alamos. To get an idea of what those idiots did right click
any icon on your windoze desktop. You will see "Properties" where it says "read only" "Hidden" our Chinese friend basically just unchecked the box (probably command line driven rather that GUI (Graphic user Interface) and that is how he went about giving himself permission to download the files (claims about his "innocence" blah blah blah I have never bought it. Los Alamos looked like such idiots and of course our leadership as well, they just wanted the entire affair to go away I believe.
Now our VA has achieved an even higher degree of silliness allowing this to occur. I is important to remember however they have nothing on the next group.
Not to be outdone in the idiot IT security department the US Army IT guys in Kabul if the media story is to believed allowed unencrypted flash drives to wander off post and downtown with unsecure intelligence information on them.
Argggh!!!
All easily fixable by three monkeys and football which by all accounts would have been more equal to the task than those assigned. W
30
posted on
05/30/2006 12:12:03 AM PDT
by
WLR
("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
To: WLR
Think about this. Our Authorities Threw Mitnick (Hacker extrodinare) in Jail for hacking right? Charged then dropped the charges against the Chinese Guy at Los Alamos they laid out a perfectly plausable tale so I figure he is guilty but really it is impossible to know either way (that would be an awful situation to find yourself in if you were innocent). They Threatened to throw Phil Zimmerman in Jail for creating PGP well actually because people sent it overseas on paper (so it could not be blocked) In each case somebody fairly bright appeared to have out thought the current security. Why not follow the tradition of the US Navy with Lucky Luciano and put them to work for the US helping us secure stuff (not sure if the Chinese guy really qualifies but since they wrecked his reputation anyway. If they kept an eye on him and he had a mind to he could really bring some perspective to the problem. The point is we keep hammering some of the Best and Brightest amongst us be they Kids or otherwise. (Zimmerman does not even own PGP which he created anymore.)
Why not put them to work and make things related to security for the US work properly.
W
31
posted on
05/30/2006 12:41:52 AM PDT
by
WLR
("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
To: WLR
"Why not put them to work and make things related to security for the US work properly."
Not a bad idea, but who will guard the guardians? We need hackers, but can we trust them? Horns of a dilemma time, that!
32
posted on
05/30/2006 10:01:52 AM PDT
by
Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
To: DoughtyOne
Just because the data could be sold for huge $$$ does not in any way of course impugn the patriotism of this honest, hard working . . . government official. /sarc
33
posted on
06/02/2006 11:57:51 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil institutions)
To: Jacquerie
I'd like to have the FBI check this guy's finances about every six months for the next couple of years. That includes off-shore accounts.
You don't take a (or multiple) disks like this home and then lose it.
BTW, why hasn't this guy been cashiered, or has he?
34
posted on
06/02/2006 4:03:06 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hey Senators, what have you done with those Conservatives we sent to Congress? (CyberAnt Inspired))
To: Eagle9
To: DoughtyOne
I'm fairly certain I read in an AP article that he resigned.
Imagine if a private company did something similar. Anyone whose identity was subsequently stolen could sue and recover some damages. Think a vet could do the same?
36
posted on
06/03/2006 3:46:47 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil institutions)
To: Jacquerie
Well, some of them should stand up and scream bloody murder. If not this will happen again, or worse.
37
posted on
06/03/2006 8:34:35 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hey Senators, what have you done with those Conservatives we sent to Congress? (CyberAnt Inspired))
To: WLR
38
posted on
06/09/2006 1:35:46 PM PDT
by
Eagle9
To: Eagle9
maybe now would be a good time to sign up for the identity theft protection deals, like from equifax, experion, trans union?
39
posted on
06/09/2006 1:57:50 PM PDT
by
isom35
To: isom35
maybe now would be a good time to sign up for the identity theft protection deals, like from equifax, experion, trans union? You can get a 90 day fraud alert put on your credit check for free at those three companies you listed. After 90 days, call again and get another fraud alert.
Identity Theft is much worse than fraudulent credit cards. It can take years and a lot of $$ to get corrected.
40
posted on
06/09/2006 2:06:00 PM PDT
by
Eagle9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson