Skip to comments.
Reuters employee issues 'Zionist pig' death threat (to Little Green Footballs 5/29/06)
Yedioth Ahronoth ^
| May 29, 2006
| Yaakov Lappin
Posted on 05/29/2006 11:37:26 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
Edited on 08/06/2006 5:07:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-182 next last
To: KJC1
I have access. I'm new here but post on LGF. I was there when the "Reuters" threat threads were up.
To: West Coast Conservative
The individual was not an employee of Reuters' news division."Correct. He was an employee of Reuters' Jihad division, working in the "Kill all the infidels" department.
Mark
122
posted on
08/06/2006 2:37:52 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
123
posted on
08/06/2006 2:40:04 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: backhoe
"I don't want to get in too deep - but, despite NAT/DHCP, every single computer has a NIC which has a MAC address. The sender at Reuters IP address must have sent a packet/frame with a MAC Sender ID and a MAC recipient ID (or a numerical derivation of said address)."Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's just not going to work. First off, you can change the MAC address using software that's probably on your computer right now (within the network drivers). But you won't need to: You see, if there's a bridge or router between the source and destination, then the source MAC address is gone, and the destination MAC address no longer matters. Wiped away. The IP protocol couldn't care less about the MAC address. In fact, even if it knew what it was, it wouldn't know what to do with it. The MAC address is only useful in identifing a network interface on a local network.
Mark
124
posted on
08/06/2006 2:44:10 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: West Coast Conservative
Are you threatening me?! Bring me TP!! I need TP for my Bunglawala!!
125
posted on
08/06/2006 2:45:13 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
Comment #126 Removed by Moderator
To: top 2 toe red
I seem to remember you 'defending' this photo on another thread yesterday...now you question why this is under breaking news. maybe you should get your facts straight, bub. I wasnt defending the picture, but I wasnt going to look at ONE picture without looking at the original before I start foaming at the mouth and screaming like chicken little that the world is all against us.
If a muslim terrorist were threatening your life over revealing a faked photo...I wonder would your attitude be the same? Somehow I doubt it!!!
Not exactly sure what your babbling about...maybe you should start breaking the prozacs in half.
Just what kind of dog do you have in this fight?
yeah...you got me tinfoiler...im secretly a hezbo fan. You caught me.....good job Matlock
To: backhoe
- see #106 for a link to the latest info.I didn't think it was possible but you've outdone yourself ... again.
128
posted on
08/06/2006 3:31:10 PM PDT
by
Eagle9
To: bnelson44
My, my.... It would appear that the "heads" over at Reuters are working overtime this weekend.
As well they should!
129
posted on
08/06/2006 3:36:26 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Congress is like the Mafia - NO PAY, NO PLAY.)
To: West Coast Conservative
"Gotcha!" is right, but some how I get the unsettling feeling--when taking into consideration the dimension and depth of international Islamofascism--we are going to have at least 100 more years of this globally, and while this may be one small victory, it is essentially going to be like endlessy swatting mosquitoes at a family picnic.
130
posted on
08/06/2006 3:47:31 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(A few clever bones tossed on gay unions, flag burning & Iraq still don't absolve GWB over BORDERS)
To: jimtorr
That comment begs the question, which Reuters division was he employed by?The Dept. of International Jihad.
To: JohnathanRGalt; backhoe; piasa; Godzilla; nwctwx; All
UPDATED with 2 corrections and ON THE NET...
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 10" (June 1, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 9" (June 1, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "WATCHING THE WATCHERS" (May 31, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 8" (May 31, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 7" (May 31, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 6" (May 30, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 5" (May 30, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 4" (May 29, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 3" (May 28, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE 2" (May 27, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "REUTERS DEATH THREAT UPDATE" (May 27, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs - Weblog: "A DEATH THREAT FROM REUTERS (Bumpted)" (May 26, 2006)
LittleGreenFootballs.com - Weblog: "WE GOT MAIL FROM REUTERS (Bumped)" (May 25, 2006)
132
posted on
08/06/2006 3:53:45 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: Eagle9
133
posted on
08/06/2006 4:10:22 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: MarkL
Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's just not going to work. First off, you can change the MAC address using software that's probably on your computer right now (within the network drivers). But you won't need to: You see, if there's a bridge or router between the source and destination, then the source MAC address is gone, and the destination MAC address no longer matters. Wiped away. The IP protocol couldn't care less about the MAC address. In fact, even if it knew what it was, it wouldn't know what to do with it. The MAC address is only useful in identifing a network interface on a local network.I did not write that, but I appreciate the further info.
134
posted on
08/06/2006 4:13:27 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: West Coast Conservative; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; ...
The Terrorist Media! alert.
The bomb-throwing jihadists @ Reuters have taken a break from photoshopping and are issuing email death threats to us dhimmis.
135
posted on
08/06/2006 7:04:41 PM PDT
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
To: West Coast Conservative
Dear Al-Reuters,
Why do you employ people who threaten the lives of conservative bloggers and only "suspend"
them when they get caught by the outside world? Why should anyone trust your reporting when
you are obviously IN-BEDded with Hezbollah? Why do I believe you will try to get away with
stepping-up your propaganda machine yet another notch? Why? Because you are Losing your
not-so-private War on the USA and Israel and you are as desperate as the Islamic fascists who
try to create chaos and hate towards the West.
Have a Not-so-nice Day!
136
posted on
08/06/2006 7:05:41 PM PDT
by
divine_moment_of_facts
("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
To: West Coast Conservative
these peaceful people really love their throat cutting.
To: SJackson
138
posted on
08/06/2006 7:35:39 PM PDT
by
Valin
(http://www.irey.com/)
To: West Coast Conservative
139
posted on
08/06/2006 8:11:07 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Congress is like the Mafia - NO PAY, NO PLAY.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Drudge has posted the link to this story at the top of his page (currently - 11:45pm, Sun. Aug 6, '06):
Reuters admits altering Beirut photo
[Excerpt]
Reuters withdraws photograph of Beirut after Air Force attack after US blogs, photographers point out 'blatant evidence of manipulation.' Reuters' head of PR says in response, 'Reuters has suspended photographer until investigations are completed into changes made to photograph.' Photographer who sent altered image is same Reuters photographer behind many of images from Qana, which have also been subject of suspicions for being staged.
Yaakov Lappin
A Reuters photograph of smoke rising from buildings in Beirut has been withdrawn after coming under attack by American web logs. The blogs accused Reuters of distorting the photograph to include more smoke and damage.
The photograph showed two very heavy plumes of black smoke billowing from buildings in Beirut after an Air Force attack on the Lebanese capital. Reuters has since withdrawn the photograph from its website, along a message admitting that the image was distorted, and an apology to editors.
Reuters withdraws doctored image
In the message, Reuters said that "photo editing software was improperly used on this image. A corrected version will immediately follow this advisory. We are sorry for any inconvience."
Reuters' head of PR Moira Whittle said in response: "Reuters has suspended a photographer until investigations are completed into changes made to a photograph showing smoke billowing from buildings following an air strike on Beirut. Reuters takes such matters extremely seriously as it is strictly against company editorial policy to alter pictures."
"As soon as the allegation came to light, the photograph, filed on Saturday 5 August, was removed from the file and a replacement, showing the same scene, was sent. The explanation for the removal was the improper use of photo-editing software," she added.
Earlier, Charles Johnson, of the Little Green Footballs blog , which has exposed a previous attempt at fraud by a major American news corporation, wrote : "This Reuters photograph shows blatant evidence of manipulation. Notice the repeating patterns in the smoke; this is almost certainly caused by using the Photoshop clone tool to add more smoke to the image."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-182 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson