Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cryptical
I think they've already doubled their money, so unless there's a magic profit margin that marks a "money maker", you may be wrong.

Usually, the marketing costs are about the same as the cost to make a movie. So a $125 Million cost of making a movie means $250 Million total cost when marketing is added into the expense column.

Or so I am told.

19 posted on 05/30/2006 7:01:13 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: N. Theknow

If that's the case, I'm sure TDC is an exception. They piggybacked on the rampant success of the book and earned lots of free media from the "controversy" of the story. They bought some tv ads, sure, but I don't think they needed to unleash the expensive marketing juggernaut your average Will Smith summer blockbuster requires.


40 posted on 05/30/2006 7:35:10 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: N. Theknow

Depends on the movie. But for big-budget pix like DaVinci, marketing costs are much less than production costs.


53 posted on 05/30/2006 8:34:04 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson