To: nckerr
Notice how they NEVER tell you who these "Economists" disappointed by the numbers are. No matter the number, it alwasy "Fails to meet expectations". Whoese? Economists working for the Democrat Party maybe?
2 posted on
06/02/2006 2:35:34 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
To: MNJohnnie
And the headlines will never read "Once again economists fail to accurately predict the economy." You never read "Weather fails to meet weather forecasters expectations"
4 posted on
06/02/2006 2:42:08 PM PDT by
techcor
To: MNJohnnie
Notice how they NEVER tell you who these "Economists" disappointed by the numbers areI think they're friends with Katie's "some people"
16 posted on
06/02/2006 3:03:39 PM PDT by
digger48
To: MNJohnnie
The MSM economists always do this. When they announced 1st quarter GDP it was said to "disappoint." GDP was subsequently updated to 5.3%, an excellent figure by historical standards, but it was said again to "disappoint" because it was anticipated the revision would be 5.6%
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson