Police officers wearing protective clothing patrol Lansdown Road in east London, June 3, 2006. REUTERS/Alessia Pierdomenico
To: Libloather
I thought the chemical/conventional bombs didn't work because the conventional explosive burns up the chemicals before they can disperse? Didn't something like that occur in the first WTC bombing?
2 posted on
06/03/2006 8:26:48 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
To: Libloather
To: Libloather
For a minute there I was worried. It's such a relief to hear the muzzie family declare their innocence.
4 posted on
06/03/2006 8:28:32 AM PDT by
romanesq
(.)
To: Libloather
Called a "dirty" chemical bomb because it was handled by the filthy islamopukes?
5 posted on
06/03/2006 8:31:52 AM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: Libloather
Neighbours said the family, who lived at the house in the ethnically-mixed Forest Gate area of London, were Bangladeshi and described them as friendly and "very religious".
Methodists, I presume.
To: Libloather
Wonder if this and that bust in Canada yesterday, was brought about by the nabbing of that top Al Qeda thug with his computers and stuff in Iraq last week.
Could this be
Bush's Fault 8 posted on
06/03/2006 8:56:33 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(I would rather be an Iraqi in a Hidatha guarded by Marines, then a subject of Al-Qeda anywhere.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson