Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
Every federal judge has recognized that a state has a compelling interests in promoting procreation, and therefore may discriminate in the area of "marriage".

So far, perhaps, but frankly I don't like the possibility of this landing in the realm of some liberal judicial loose cannon.

16 posted on 06/04/2006 8:51:37 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: SuziQ
So far, perhaps, but frankly I don't like the possibility of this landing in the realm of some liberal judicial loose cannon.

This concern could extend to a host of issues, not just marriage. But if marriage is ever endangered I would then assume that a constitutional amendment would be passed by Congress in less than a week, and ratified before sunset.

17 posted on 06/04/2006 9:13:56 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson