"So now the radicals are weeping because the amendment doesn't completely outlaw homosexuality like most of them want. "
Radicals?
Weeping?
The norm in society for marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. If you propose changing that then you are the radical.
Marriage does a lot more than gain 1 person the health benefits of the other. It provides a basis on which the rest of our culture rests. Destroy marriage and you destroy the culture. But then I'm guessing you alrady knew that.
The one thing you radicals have in common is that its all about you. My rights, my wants, my desires....theres never any thought to what is good for our country.
Which is ironic as the liberals use "the good of the many" as a guideline to further so many other agendas.
I don't propose changing it in my state. If it comes up I will vote to keep traditional marriage. But I don't care what Massachusetts does. And unless you live there, neither should you. To want the central government to cover our religious beliefs for us and make everyone believe is against our federalist government and is quite radical.
The one thing you radicals have in common is that its all about you. My rights, my wants, my desires....theres never any thought to what is good for our country.
Uh, I'm simply trying to let sleeping dogs lie. I don't want to get rid of our Constitutional Republic. I don't want to reduce a state's just powers to have to do something because of my personal beliefs. And you call me the radical? You tell me its all about me?
Which is ironic as the liberals use "the good of the many" as a guideline to further so many other agendas.
Which is exactly what you are trying to do with this ridiculous amendment...the good of the many.