Starting off an otherwise decent analysis with the wrong premise.
The U.S. Senate has NOT made a 'strong arguement'. They have stabbed 90% of the nation in the back while making very weak argument based on political posturing rather than on reality and their Constitutional duties.
The U.S. Senate has NOT made a 'strong arguement'. They have stabbed 90% of the nation in the back while making very weak argument based on political posturing rather than on reality and their Constitutional duties.
Ditto
What is the difference between George Bush and John McCain? Not a darned thing. They are both East Coast Rockefeller Republican elitists and carpetbaggers who call the West their home.
Starting off an otherwise decent analysis with the wrong premise.
The U.S. Senate has NOT made a 'strong argument'.
You guys misread the comment and missed the sarcasm. He said "Now that the U.S. Senate has made a strong argument for unicameral government".
We currently have a "bicameral" legislature, i.e., two branches, the House and the Senate. His crack about going to a unicameral system was just a sarcastic way of stating that the Senate is making a strong case that it has become irrelevant and dangerous and should be abolished. Thus, we would be left with only the House, i.e. a "unicameral" legislature.