Freep this poll (Canadian Leaders & their Muslims/Imams)

The Globe and Mail ^ | 5 June 2006 | Globe and Mail (TO & National Newspaper)

[timsbella]

Are moderate Canadian Muslim leaders doing enough to combat radicalism?

They changed the question between 6am and 8:30 because the poll had over 4000 replies/89% negative. Please vote and send a message to the lefty media up here before they blame our Conservative, Bush-friendly PM, our police & RCMP, etc (i.e. anyone who has values and intends to make a difference.) Thanks.

[timsbella]

PS Original question was worded:

Do you feel that Canadian Muslims are doing enough to keep radical imams and mullahs away from their mosques?

[timsbella]

Ping! Me again - Globe decided to reword the original question.

[Brilliant]

"Are moderate Canadian Muslim leaders doing enough to combat radicalism?"




The term "moderate Muslim leaders" seems like an oxymoron. Or maybe it's just another effort by the media to brainwash us, by implying that there is such a thing.

[agere_contra]

797 no.

[GMMAC]

"Globe decided to reword the original question"

The Globe's next step, based upon its usual modus operandi, will be dumping 10K or more 'votes' favoring its editorial position into the totals immediately prior to closing its poll!
(typical msm slimeball methodology ... yawn!)

PING!

[kanawa]

Yes	No	Total Votes
10%	90%	1447

[Clive]

The 6 AM poll question is showing under "Past Polls" in the results page to the current poll question:

The past poll question:
Do you feel that Canadian Muslims are doing enough to keep radical imams and mullahs away from their mosques?
The Results:
Yes: 839 votes (15%)
No: 4938 votes (85%)

[GMMAC]

Pretty much proves my point.
Mop & Pail cadres have attempted to 'calm down the rabble' by abruptly inserting the word "moderate" and all that it implies.

Actually I doubt, with the apparent mood of the public, they'll resort to their well know last minute 'vote' dumping today.

To maintain whatever 'credibility' (... LOL!) they believe they have, they'll save that particular trick for their more important editorial concerns - e.g. anything which forwards the militant homosexual agenda.