Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zarf
"Let the states ban it individually and leave it alone on a national level"

Agreed, this was a band-aid fix for activist judges. Instead of fixing the problem all it'd do is turn the constitution into a dictionary.
18 posted on 06/07/2006 8:51:32 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: tfecw
Instead of fixing the problem all it'd do is turn the constitution into a dictionary.

I know of 3 Supreme Court justices (and on occassion a fourth) that need the refresher course.

130 posted on 06/07/2006 9:59:32 AM PDT by steveegg (If the illegals would turn Mexico Red if they were forced there, why wouldn't they do that here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: tfecw

no this is NOT a band aid fix.

This is a legitimate constitutional fix which neutralizes another Roe v Wade situation.

This prevents loonies form one state like Mass. imposing via FFC upon the other states.

If you were serious, you would realize this amendment preserves the rights of states against the low level state judge appointments of the other states.


147 posted on 06/07/2006 10:14:12 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: tfecw
Instead of fixing the problem all it'd do is turn the constitution into a dictionary.

I'm glad someone sees this is mainly just to define the word 'marriage'. It's interesting that some people get so worked up over a word, especially the same people who have so little respect for them.

249 posted on 06/07/2006 2:47:05 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson