Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax Relief Not as Big a Relief as Advertised
Galveston Daily News ^ | June 7, 2006 | TJ Aulds

Posted on 06/07/2006 9:52:39 AM PDT by anymouse

Homeowners expecting to save $2,000 on their school property taxes should brace for a bit of sticker shock.

According to figures from the county’s tax assessor, the best the average homeowner in the county can expect in savings thanks to the recently passed school tax relief laws is $544 during the next three years.

“I think it is a bit disingenuous to tell people they will be saving $2,000,” said Cheryl Johnson, the Galveston County Tax Assessor-Collector.

“We will definitely pay less because of the new law, but I don’t want people to be deceived about saving $2,000.”

The $2,000 figure comes from a series of campaign advertisements for Gov. Rick Perry. In each of those television commercials, Perry brags about a pay hike for Texas teachers and that “the average homeowner will receive a $2,000 tax cut” during a three-year period.

Johnson, a Republican like Perry, was cautious about calling the governor out.

But she said her research found the only way the “average” homeowner in Galveston County would see such a tax cut would be if Joe Average owns a $500,000 home.

The highest average homestead value in the county for 2006 is $216,656 in the Friendswood school district, according to Johnson’s figures.

“The closest I could come to $2,000 was if home values did not increase and if the (tax) rate did not increase, and that’s only if compared to what was paid in 2005” Johnson said. Even then the savings were only about $860, she said.

And most taxpayers would likely base any tax savings on comparing tax bills year by year, she said.

“It’s not real savings to me if how much I pay in 2008 is higher than what I pay in 2007,” she said.

Johnson said she believed her report was generous in that she based the homestead values for 2007 and 2008 on the same rate value increases from 2005 to 2006. She said also that she based her estimates on no tax rate increases by local school districts.

The new laws allow school districts to assess a one-time 4 percent rate hike with all future increases to first receive voter approval.

Johnson’s research also estimated a 2007 statewide rate reduction, which is a rate to be determined by the commissioner of education. Johnson’s report estimated that to be 33 cents.

That figure, said Johnson, is likely higher than what the actual reduction rate will be.

Johnson also used typical homestead exemptions in her report.

Based on Johnson’s estimates, residents in Friendswood school district would see the biggest tax “savings.” By comparison Galveston school district residents would save on average $91.

Homeowners in Hitchcock school district will receive the lowest tax bill savings — $4.87.

+++

Estimates of tax savings on average homesteads in Galveston County ISDs

2005 2006 2007* 2008*

Clear Creek ISD

Average HS value $163,229 $171,148 $179,452 $188,158

Average M & O HS tax bill** $2,112.27 $1,972.94 $1,562.29 $1,645.00

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$139.33 -$410.64 $82.71

Cumulative three-year saving $467.26

Dickinson ISD

Average HS value $97,656 $103,194 $109,047 $115,232

Average M & O HS tax bill** $1,239.84 $1,172.98 $940.47 $1,002.32

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$66.85 -$232.51 $61.85

Cumulative three-year saving -$237.52

Friendswood ISD

Average HS value $204,086 $216,656 $230,000 $244,165

Average M & O HS tax bill** $2,836.29 $2,682.02 $2,150.00 $2,291.65

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$154.27 -$532.03 $141.66

Cumulative three-year saving -$544.64

Galveston ISD

Average HS value $106,609 $117,023 $128,455 $141,004

Average M & O HS tax bill** $1,099.30 $1,085.53 $907.64 $1,008.03

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$13.78 -$177.89 $100.39

Cumulative three-year saving -$91.27

High Island ISD

Average HS value $55,253 $58,873 $62,730 $66,840

Average M & O HS tax bill** $483.04 $466.81 $381.84 $414.72

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$16.23 -$84.97 $32.88

Cumulative three-year saving -$68.31

Hitchcock ISD

Average HS value $80,957 $90,595 $101,380 $113,449

Average M & O HS tax bill** $989.36 $1,005.41 $863.80 $984.49

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes $16.05 -$141.61 $120.69

Cumulative three-year saving -$4.87

La Marque ISD

Average HS value $85,229 $92,573 $100,549 $109,212

Average M & O HS tax bill** $1,053.44 $1,031.72 $855.49 $942.12

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$21.72 -$176.23 $86.64

Cumulative three-year saving -$111.31

Santa Fe ISD

Average HS value $99,634 $103,449 $107,410 $111,522

Average M & O HS tax bill** $1,227.19 $1,132.14 $877.89 $916.96

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$95.04 -$254.25 $39.07

Cumulative three-year saving -$310.22

Texas City ISD

Average HS value $79,137 $84,828 $90,928 $97,466

Average M & O HS tax bill** $769.65 $742.97 $607.42 $659.73

Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$26.68 -$135.55 $52.31

Cumulative three-year saving -$109.92

* — Based on market value increase proposed for period 2005 and 2006

** — After typical HS exemptions


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cheryljohnson; democratmath; galvestoncounty; property; tax; taxes; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Another credible county tax collector/assessor shows Gov. Perry's tax plan to be "smoke and mirrors."

Cheryl Johnson is a the Democrats worst nightmare - a smart, charismatic Republican woman official that isn't afraid to tell it like it is and back it up with facts.

1 posted on 06/07/2006 9:52:43 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze; BellStar

Cheryl Johnson tax ping.


2 posted on 06/07/2006 9:53:46 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

To be fair, Perry did not say that the $2,000 was in US dollars. He could have been talking pesos.


3 posted on 06/07/2006 10:13:21 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40

they wish it was in euros


4 posted on 06/07/2006 10:21:26 AM PDT by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

no property appraisal caps = no tax relief what so ever...

it's all smoke an mirrors...


5 posted on 06/07/2006 10:21:44 AM PDT by fhlh (Polls are for Strippers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40

He must have ment cents not dollars considering the following ISD -

Hitchcock ISD
Cumulative three-year saving -$4.87


6 posted on 06/07/2006 10:23:42 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy; HoustonCurmudgeon; hocndoc; DrewsDad; BUSHdude2000; antivenom; humblegunner

This is just one smart and Cute little Galveston County Elected Republican Chick, Cheryl Johnson's take on this.
We all worked hard to get her elected. And we are pretty proud of her. What say all of you? I'm still reading.
I'm a little slow.


7 posted on 06/07/2006 1:42:46 PM PDT by BellStar (God makes a promise, faith believes it, hope anticipates it, patience quietly awaits it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Friendswood ISD
Average HS value $204,086 $216,656 $230,000 $244,165
Average M & O HS tax bill** $2,836.29 $2,682.02 $2,150.00 $2,291.65
Savings based on 2005 M&O taxes -$154.27 -$532.03 $141.66
Cumulative three-year saving -$544.64

OK, so whay wouldn't this be (2,836.29 x 3)-(2,682.02 + 2,150.00 + 2,291.65) = $1385.20? Why are they only caclulating the savings delta from the previous year instead of from this year's tax?

And most taxpayers would likely base any tax savings on comparing tax bills year by year, she said.
“It’s not real savings to me if how much I pay in 2008 is higher than what I pay in 2007,” she said.

These numbers are bogus. She should calculate the totals with her 6.15% increases(which gives aproximately 1.065 increase in the tax rate) without any reductions and them subtract the toals with the reduction.

If you do this, then it will be (2,836.29 x (1.065+1.065^2+1.065^3)-(2,682.02 + 2,150.00 + 2,291.65) = $2,540.07

8 posted on 06/07/2006 2:33:41 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
The $2,000 figure comes from a series of campaign advertisements for Gov. Rick Perry. In each of those television commercials, Perry brags about a pay hike for Texas teachers and that “the average homeowner will receive a $2,000 tax cut” during a three-year period.

I think Perry means "average" in HIS neighborhood.

Good on Johnson for pointing this up.

9 posted on 06/07/2006 2:39:27 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BellStar

Sorry BellStar, I don't agree with her numbers. This looks like democrat math.


10 posted on 06/07/2006 2:40:22 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad

She is no Democrat but her math was odd to me too!
But than I'm no Math Major either.


11 posted on 06/07/2006 3:29:58 PM PDT by BellStar (God makes a promise, faith believes it, hope anticipates it, patience quietly awaits it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
If you know her, please call or email her and have her calculate the savings based on the total that would have been paid in the next 3 years without the property tax cut and the total with the reduction.

Hopefully with a retraction, CKMRS, Kinky, and Bell will feel a little guilty before spreading this all over.

12 posted on 06/07/2006 3:39:57 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I can't believe out of all the millions of people in Texas we can't find someone better than the empty suit that resides in the Governor's Mansion.


13 posted on 06/07/2006 3:41:52 PM PDT by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Dunno about his agenda or math but Bettencourt (Harris County TAC) says it's $23 next year for Harris County and $268 the following. Maybe all these tax folks are math challenged (might explain my tax bill).

http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2006/05/29/daily31.html

14 posted on 06/07/2006 3:58:19 PM PDT by Proud_texan (I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_texan

Perry was wrong in basing his numbers off the average sales price, but we don't need to make it any worse than it really is. It should be the difference between having the property tax cut and not for 3 years. Don't throw in this year to year delta or add an increase to one figure and not the other.


15 posted on 06/07/2006 4:10:30 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
Did someone call for pictures? :)


Cheryl E. Johnson
Galveston County
Tax Assessor-Collector

16 posted on 06/07/2006 7:35:18 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad
I did my own calculation for my home, and it will be $2200 over three years. And my house appraises for less than $150,000.

These assessors have an agenda, it would appear.

17 posted on 06/07/2006 7:40:36 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad
Harris County Tax Assessor/Collector Paul Bettencourt has also ran the numbers on the actual property tax savings. They are consistent with Cherly's numbers. They work closely and I'm sure they have reviewed each others calculations. There probably are other factors taken into consideration (we have multiple overlapping taxing entities that factor into the equation) so you simplified calculations don't account for increases by those other entities that erode the tax savings that are supposed to come from the not-so Sharp Plan. They are calculating the actual refunds that the taxpayer will receive, not the theoretical savings that the Governor is claiming.
18 posted on 06/07/2006 7:43:49 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
They are calculating the actual refunds that the taxpayer will receive, not the theoretical savings that the Governor is claiming.

Then DON'T compare it to the $2,000 figure!

If there was no plan passed, the Friendswood example would result in a $1134.52 tax increase, the way you are calculating it.

19 posted on 06/07/2006 7:53:52 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
OK, here's a simplified test for you:

If your taxes were lowered from $2,000 per year to $1,000 per year, what would your "Cumulative three-year savings" be?

Democrat Math Answer: $1,000
$2,000, $2,000, $2,000
-$1,000, $0, $0
Savings = $1,000

Actual Math Answer: $3,000
(2,000+2,000+2,000)-(1,000+1,000+1,000)
Actual 3 year savings = $3,000

Now, tell me which one do you agree with?

20 posted on 06/07/2006 8:22:28 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson