Annan seeks global forum on migration

washingtontimes.com/ ^ | Jun. 7, 2006

[B4Ranch]

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan Wednesday proposed a global forum on international migration and its impact on development. (snip) He said his "International Migration and Development" report is an early road map for the new era of mobility. He said, "The advantages that migration brings are not as well understood as they should be."

[B4Ranch]

Oh you can bet your behind that we understand the advantages of migration, Mr. Kofi.

1. Increased taxes out the gazoo.

2. Clasrooms that are busting at the seams.

3. Students who want to go to college on our dime.

4. Parents who want to stay firmly in touch with their native countries.

5. Parents who want to collect off of every government program that is available to anyone with multiple false identities.

6. Increased crime out the royal gazoo.

7. Prisons that are overloaded with criminals who can't speak more that four words of English in one sentence. (Hold your arms up. Gringo, I shoot you!)

8. More accidents on the highways than I ever thought possible from speeding drunks.

9. Insurance rates going through the clouds.

10. Miracles. 50 people living in one two bedroom house.

11. Hospitals closing left and right, emergency rooms locking the doors.

12. Press #2 for English

13. Learning about "jobs that Americans won't do" from our President.

14. May 1st has become National Mexican Flag Day with millions of foreigners marching in our streets demanding their rights.

15. Having our DMV Offices become little immigration centers where is everyone demanding drivers licenses.

_______________________________________________________________________________

You can continue the list with changes you have observed in our nation.

[PzLdr]

I'll go for it ONLY if it deals with the SOLE issue of MIGRATING the U.S out of the U.N, and Coffee Anus' U.N out of the U.S.

[FerdieMurphy]

Why hasn't this bozo been criminally charged for his part in the Oil For Food scandal?

[A CA Guy]

Let them stay home and make their own paradise instead of turning ours into a ghetto.

[B4Ranch]

[namvet66]

Wonder if study will address how many "migrants" are headed for Ghana?

Probably only those at gunpoint. LOL

[Eric in the Ozarks]

How about a conference on the Rule of Law or Property Rights in these "migrant" countries ?

[B4Ranch]

& all
________________________

[B4Ranch]

Look what our Congress has done for American National Parks regarding the UN.

The reason why the management in Big Bend is saying,
>>"The Rio Grande is NOT a national border, but only a feature of the landscape."<<
is because the control of the National Park System is under the United Nations. The United Nations does not recognize 'national borders'.

I'm not going to edit this again as I posted it for http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1195311/posts?page=38#38 a couple of years ago. Just click on one of the park names and see where you are redirected.

Not everyone understands what the AWB is but they do know what a National Park is, so let me use the National Parks System as an example of what OUR Republican Congressmen and women have given away to UN control without a word to us! (Remember the people who make the rules for our freedoms inside these Parks are appointed not elected. That's the way the UN works things.)

I have watched and protested as our sustainable development supporting Republican legislators aided the Democrats in giving control of the land in our National Parks, Preserves and Monuments, World Heritage Site, Biosphere Reserves as designated by the UN to the United Nations.

This involves 68% of public land in ! Yet we cannot get American citizens to stand up together and say, "STOP!"

(Um just how many Americans do you think are actually willing to fight for OUR 2nd Amendment when they won't even bother about Yellowstone)

Some of the land I'm referring to is:

USA	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1	Aleutian Islands	1976
2	Big Bend	1976
3	Cascade Head	1976
4	Central Plains	1976
5	Channel Islands	1976
6	Coram	1976
7	Denali	1976
8	Desert	1976
9	Everglades & Dry Tortugas	1976
10	Fraser	1976
11	Glacier	1976
12	H.J. Andrews	1976
13	Hubbard Brook	1976
14	Jornada	1976
15	Luquillo	1976
16	Noatak	1976
17	Olympic	1976
18	Organ Pipe Cactus	1976
19	Rocky Mountain	1976
20	San Dimas	1976
21	San Joaquin	1976
22	Sequoia-Kings Canyon	1976
23	Stanislaus-Tuolumne	1976
24	Three Sisters	1976
25	Virgin Islands	1976
26	Yellowstone	1976
27	Beaver Creek	1976
28	Konza Prairie	1978
29	Niwot Ridge	1979
30	University of Michigan Biological Station	1979
31	Virginia Coast	1979
32	Hawaiian Islands	1980
33	Isle Royale	1980
34	Big Thicket	1981
35	Guanica	1981
36	California Coast Ranges	1983
37	Central Gulf Coast Plain	1983
38	South Atlantic Coastal Plain	1983
39	Mojave and Colorado Deserts	1984
40	Carolinian-South Atlantic	1986
41	Glacier Bay-Admiralty Is.	1986
42	Golden Gate	1988
43	New Jersey Pinelands	1988
44	Southern Appalachian	1988
45	Champlain-Adirondak	1989
46	Mammoth Cave Area	1990	1996 (extended)
47	Land Between The Lakes	1991

These are the most treasured parks in our country! But our elected REPUBLICAN officials didn't have a problem turning control over to the 191 Member States of the United Nations.

Tell me what interests should Iraq, Iran and Sudan have in you visiting our National Parks.

posted on 08/21/2004 8:30:15 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Don't be so open minded that Your Brains Fall Out--Respect shouldn't be given, It Must Be Earned)

[A CA Guy]

Not good at all. Never knew that, thanks.

[devolve]

[potlatch]

A great "wake em up' post!

[DoughtyOne]

I note that there are an awful lot of people around these parts who will now be on the same side as Kofi Annan regarding immigration. Kindof gives you warm fuzzies...

[garbageseeker]

Another great idea from the League of Nations.

[texastoo]

I think we have been had. I googled International Migration and Development. Look what I found.

http://www.iom.int/

The UN is sure of themselves. Click on the booklets.

"In 2003, gross flows to developing countries amounted to US$ 142 billion, compared to US$ 18.4 billion in 1980. The annual average figure increased from US$ 7.8 million in 1975-79 to a recorded total of US$ 98 billion in 1998-2003. According to the World Bank, international remittances received by developing countries were expected to reach US$ 167 billion in 2005 - a more than ninefold increase over the past 25 years. Given the importance of this topic, IOM is pleased to be able to co-sponsor the publication of this new study by Bimal Ghosh with The Hague Process on Refugees and Migration."

There is no way our borders will ever be secured.

[Lady Jag]

Kofi Annanny

[dalereed]

Send all his beloved "migrants" including all the illegals that are here to whatever 3rd world hell hole he is from.

[proud_yank]

you see this???

[devolve]

YOU  DON'T  NEED  PAPERS  FOR  VOTING

[potlatch]

LOL, "how tweet it is, but not for you"!!